“In the end, there is no end.”– Robert Lowell

Remembering Harriet Zinnes (1919-2019) 

The person one becomes is the result of innumerable factors, including hundreds if not thousands of personal relationships. But only a handful of those relationships are memorable.

One such relationship for me was the several years I knew Harriet Zinnes. I was a student of hers when I enrolled in a modern poetry course that she was teaching at Queens College. I took another course from her on Ezra Pound and a third, I believe, on the writing of poetry.

I was sort of a working-class jock in college – not the type of person I’d ever think Professor Zinnes would take an interest in. But she did, and we became friends. Perhaps not close friends, but close enough that she would talk to me about how it was to be a poet and a teacher.

I felt that she believed in me – not necessary as a poet, but as a person with potential.

I lost touch with her after college, but I’ve thought of her thousand times since then, particularly when I thought about poetry and teaching.

I have mentioned her in my essays now and then. Recently, I got a note from her daughter, who had found one of those essays online. She said that her mother had just passed away at age 100 and that there would be a memorial in the spring. I will be there.

Here is Harriet Zinnes’s obituary from the website of the Colorado Review, where she was a frequent contributor: https://bit.ly/2sNsyoE

Continue Reading

“The Equality Conundrum” in The New Yorker

Believing inequality, as this essay makes clear, is a challenge. A challenge that leaves the believer with a perpetual conundrum – what is equal here is not equal there… and what is equal now is not equal then… and what is equal from one perspective in not equal from another.

The essay touches on the philosophical problem but doesn’t offer an answer, because there isn’t one. Once you accept the proposition that equality is a good thing, you are lost.

The fact is that nothing is equal because of relativity. And even if two things could be equal for one moment in time and space, that relationship would change in the next moment.

Nothing is equal and nothing wants to be equal.

The very nature of being human is the instinctive desire for inequality. Some want more. Some want less. Some are willing to do more. Some want to find ways to do less.

We should stop fussing over it. Inequality is not a problem. It is the natural state of nature and the natural desire of the human heart.

You can read the New Yorker essay here.

Continue Reading

conundrum (noun) 

A conundrum (Kuh-NUN-drum) is a confusing and difficult problem or question. As I used it today (see “Worth Reading,” above): “Believing inequality… is a challenge. A challenge that leaves the believer with a perpetual conundrum.”

Continue Reading

There are 206 to 208 bones in the adult human body (depending on how the sternum is counted). Babies are born with 270 bones, but the number decreases with age as some of those bones fuse.

Continue Reading

In response to Donald Trump’s latest demonstration of his version of foreign policy – i.e, coming out into the center of the ring very aggressively and then backing away before his opponent figures out what hits him – Bill Bonner published a very instructive essay on his blog. I pass it along to you here, pretty much in its entirety…

“The Age of Descent: A Short History of the 21st Century (So Far)” by Bill Bonner 

 “The Age of Descent began at the end of the 20th century. Then, four decades of bad money, bad policies, and the badass Deep State caught up with the U.S.

“By 2016, the War on Terror – designed to transfer wealth from the public to the armed wing of the Deep State – had already been going on for 15 years, funded by debt.

“And for the most recent six years, the Federal Reserve had conducted a war against normal business and economic cycles – preventing normal corrections – in order to keep the wealth flowing to Wall Street and the richest 10% of the population.

“It was then, in the election of 2016, that voters faced a sour choice. There was the devil they knew, Hillary Clinton. And there was the one they didn’t know, Donald Trump.

“Given what they knew at the time, they seem to have made the best choice; they voted, by a hair, to get to know the devil, Trump. At the very least, he promised something new.

“He said he would end the foreign wars… and pay off the national debt in eight years. The reasonable voter could say to himself: ‘Even if he disappoints me, he still seems to want to go in the right direction.’

“Mr. Trump also promised to call a spade a spade. In that, voters got perhaps even more than they expected. But it soon became evident that the reality TV show star didn’t know what a spade was. His shows had been scripted for him.

Deep State Script 

“In the fall of 2018, the Fed was normalizing interest rates and draining away the $3.6 trillion in excess liquidity (new money) it had introduced during the crisis years. This policy was known as QT or quantitative tightening.

“But then, with a sell-off in the stock market, and under threat from the Trump White House, the Fed panicked. It promptly ended its ‘normalizing’ of interest rates. A year later, in September 2019 and still, under pressure from the president, it panicked again and ended QT.

“Suddenly, it began flooding the markets with new money again. More spending and a tax cut had increased federal deficits. By that time, foreigners had largely stopped funding U.S. red ink. Americans were reluctant, too. This left only the Fed. It funded 90% of federal borrowing needs by creating about $4 billion per day of new, fake money.

“But it probably didn’t matter very much who was in the White House. While the president keeps his ratings up with unchecked impulses and improv dialog, the real, important lines are still scripted – by the Deep State.

Bitter Catastrophe

“By the opening of the 21st century, the military/industrial/congressional complex that Eisenhower had warned about in 1961 was a reality. It could not be stopped.

“Too many powerful people depended on it – for their reputations, their careers, and their wealth. Trillions of dollars were taken from the public in order to reward the Pentagon and its crony suppliers, Wall Street, and all the hangers-on, chislers, and shysters of The Swamp.https://www.markford.net/wp-admin/admin.php?page=jetpack

“Nor could the demographic trends be denied. More and more people were leaving productive careers to go into retirement. The over-75 population segment was the fastest-growing of all; it was also the group that needed the most care and attention. Now, with so many older voters, increased entitlement spending could not be stopped, either.

“And now, despite the irrefutable math and ineluctable financial debacle, the public barely seems to notice. Impeachment. Assassination. Partisan politics. Rising stock prices. Everything seems more important than saving the nation from a bitter catastrophe.

Insiders vs. the People

“The voters take sides. Some are for the president, some are against him.

“But they square off on issues that have little significance. Good guys vs. bad guys. Rich vs. Poor. White vs. Black. Straight vs. Gay. Red vs. Blue. Even man vs. woman. The Chinese are the enemy one day. The next, it is the Mexicans. And then, the Iranians.

“The real fight, the Deep State insiders vs. the People, is rarely mentioned. And so the Deep State keeps winning. Debt increases. The wars go on.

“And while the empire still has its soldiers all over the world… and controls the seas with its heavy ships… and the air with its high-tech airplanes… it nevertheless descends, sinks, and slides deeper and deeper into the mud.”

Continue Reading

By Dr. Martin Luther King 

* We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools. (Western Michigan University, December 1963)

* Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. (Nobel Lecture, University of Oslo, December 1964)

* We must accept finite disappointment, but never lose infinite hope. (In My Own Words, a collection of King’s sermons, speeches, and writings selected by his widow, Coretta Scott King)

* I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. (“I Have a Dream” speech, Lincoln Memorial, August 1963)

* I must confess, my friends, the road ahead will not always be smooth. There will still be rocky places of frustration and meandering points of bewilderment. There will be inevitable setbacks here and there…. Difficult and painful as it is, we must walk on in the days ahead with an audacious faith in the future. (“Where Do We Go From Here?” speech, Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, August 1967)

* Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.  (“Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” April 16, 1963)

* Never succumb to the temptation of bitterness. (“The Most Durable Power” speech, Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, November 1956)

* Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. (Strength to Love, 1963)

* There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. (“A Proper Sense of Priorities” speech, Washington, DC, February 1968)

Continue Reading

ineluctable (adjective) 

Ineluctable (in-uh-LUK-that-bul) means inescapable; unable to be resisted or avoided. As Bill Bonner used it in the above essay: “And now, despite the irrefutable math and ineluctable financial debacle, the public barely seems to notice.”

Continue Reading

Impeachment (which is basically a charge of misconduct made against the holder of a public office) is rare. The House has initiated proceedings against top U.S. civil officials more than 60 times, but only 17 of them have been voted on. Prior to Donald Trump, only 2 presidents have been impeached: Andrew Johnson (1868) and Bill Clinton (1998). Neither was removed from the office.

Continue Reading