Another “Crazy” Idea?

A visitor looking at “In America: Remember,” a temporary art installation on the National Mall commemorating Americans who have died of COVID-19. 

When I continue to express the view that the most important “misinformation” that came to us about the COVID virus came from the WHO, the CDC, the NIH, and our government, my friends and family members no longer think I’m entirely crazy. That’s because they are now repeating the talking points of those very same sources who have been, bit by bit for the past year or so, walking back their most egregious statements by saying they were “following the science available at the time.”

For the past six months, though, I’ve been doing it again – convincing them that I am indeed crazy. Because now I’m repeating what they consider to be the most absurd of the conspiracy theories about the whole COVID fiasco. I’ve been saying that a good deal of evidence is piling up suggesting that not only were the vaccines ineffective in protecting against infection, spreading infection, or even diminishing the fatality of infection, they were causing all sorts of serious side effects. Some of which may be fatal.

I’m going to touch on this latest “crazy” idea by mentioning something I discovered just today…

Early this year, Michigan State University Professor Mark Skidmore submitted a study concluding that at least 217,000 Americans died in 2021 because of the COVID vaccine. Not the virus. The essay appeared and then was retracted. And the university commenced a seven-month investigation into possible “unethical behavior” on the part of the professor.

Earlier this month, he was exonerated of all charges. And his findings were incorporated into a revised paper that, among other things, concluded this:

“With these survey data, the total number of fatalities due to COVID-19 inoculation may be as high as 289,789. The large difference in the possible number of fatalities due to COVID-19 vaccination that emerges from this survey and the available governmental data should be further investigated.”

Click here to read the entire paper.

Three New Takes on America’s COVID Response 

* He Doesn’t Sound Like a Conspiracy Theorist! Dr William Makis, who has been labeled by Big Pharma as a conspiracy theorist, and whose essays on the mRNA COVID vaccines have been criticized as fallacious by “Fact Check” (a bought-and-paid-for Leftist lobbying group), talks here about increased reports of the harmful side effects of the vaccines. I don’t know enough about this hot, new argument. But, judging by his demeanor and his presentation, he doesn’t seem like a nutcase to me. What do you think?

* Professor Denis Rancourt on All-Cause Mortality. This research scientist has been questioning the information we’ve been getting from the government since the beginning of the COVID outbreak. Here, he talks about all-cause mortality rates and how they help us understand the debate.

* Diary of a Vaccine Devotee. If you are a big believer in the safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines, you won’t find this funny. But if you have doubts, you might enjoy it, as I did. (If you don’t know anything about the vaccine debates, be prepared. You may find this disturbing.) Click here.

More Studies Show that COVID Vaccines Can Infect and Affect DNA

Artist’s depiction of a virus particle covered with spike proteins 

If you’ve done any reading about COVID-19 and the vaccines created to combat it, you’ve heard about “spike proteins,” which the body uses to fight the virus.

The CDC has taken the position that the spike proteins from the vaccines (which are synthetic) do not enter our DNA and are eliminated from the body soon after they produce an immune response. (This is what happens to the spike proteins that are created naturally, from the virus itself.) But new studies have found spike proteins in vaccinated individuals as long as three to even six months after vaccination.

Click here.

Bad Medicine: Prescribing Drugs That Don’t Work

GM wrote to remind me/us that approving Big Pharma drugs that don’t work is not a new phenomenon. He provides two examples. Click here and here.

Blood Pressure Drugs: Are They Any Better (or Safer) Than Statins?

For the last 10 years, PB, one of my trainers, has been taking my blood pressure at least three times every time I train. Two or three times a week. In all that time, my systolic numbers ranged from 110 to 120, while my diastolic numbers ranged from 70 to 80. That’s healthy for someone my age.

About a month ago, though, my blood pressure was 190/110. Which is considered “dangerous.” We continued with the training, but at a moderate pace, and he took several more measurements. They varied somewhat but were all too high. Over the next few days, they varied from normal to scary high.

I called my primary care physician. He told me that high blood pressure at my age is common. And he wrote me a prescription.

That sort of knee-jerk resort to prescribing a drug worried me. I did some research and discovered that blood pressure medication is effective in controlling symptoms (i.e., the numbers). But, like the statins prescribed for high cholesterol, has not been effective in extending life.

When I mentioned that fact to my doctor at my next appointment, he didn’t dispute it. “But it will reduce your chance of getting a debilitating stroke,” he said.

“Fair enough,” I thought. But in researching that claim, I couldn’t find any studies that persuaded me it was true.

I was in a dilemma. My rational brain was telling me that neither the cholesterol drug I was taking nor the blood pressure drug was going to do me any good. But it also reminded me that the research I’d done was limited, as was my experience. Which made it impossible to consult with my limbic brain to see if it could guide me in this matter.

So, I decided to take a halfway measure. Literally. Currently, I’m taking the statin and the blood pressure drug. But at half the doses recommended by my doctor. (Don’t bother writing to tell me what’s wrong with this as a “solution.” I know that. But if you have a better one, backed up with believable data, let me know.)

Meanwhile, I discovered that the dramatic and quick onset of high blood pressure, such as what I experienced, can be a side effect of taking – as I am doing – a combination of blood thinners, statins, and anti-depressants. And if that’s true… what to do?

I’m reporting on this not to subject you, dear reader, to a never-ending account of my health issues, but to throw some light on protocols and practices of modern medicine that are widely accepted but, in fact, have little if any science behind them. In all the research I’ve been doing, I haven’t found reliable solutions to any of the most common modern illnesses (cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and obesity). But I have discovered that many of the recommended, state-of-the-art treatments are defective.

Speaking of which, BM, a regular reader of this blog, has been sending me links to relevant material, the most recent of which I’m passing on to you here.

New Pfizer-funded Study: The Three-Shot COVID Vaccine Regimen Is Useless (and Dangerous?) in Children Under Five

There has been an argument for vaccinating older and “immunocompromised” people against COVID. At least there was when a handful of early studies concluded that it prevented infection and spreading. But there was never any evidence that it was helpful for children. With that age cohort, in fact, the lethality rate, as reported by the WHO and the CDC, was equal to or less than the lethality rate of the flu.

Recent studies have confirmed that the vaccines weren’t necessary for children – especially those under five. That didn’t surprise me. But what I didn’t expect when I began covering our government’s response to the COVID pandemic three years ago was the mounting evidence that the vaccines have produced negative, sometimes seriously negative, side effects in children.

And what is the CDC doing about this? It’s telling parents to bring their kids in for some extra jabs!

Click here.

In the Same Vein: Why Nobody Should Wear a Face Mask

First, we found that the vaccines don’t work. Now we are learning that they have negative, even dangerous, side effects. (See above.)

The same story is unfolding with masks. First, we were told that they are effective. Then we discovered that they are not. And now we are seeing reports that wearing them for extended periods of time is harmful to our health.

Click here.

One More Reason to Lose Weight

I told you about my knee-replacement surgery six weeks ago. I’m about 70% back to where I need to be in terms of strength and flexibility, and I’m feeling confident that I’ll get the joint back to 100% in the next month or two.

The first two weeks were very painful. The next week was somewhat better. Since then, what pain there is, is manageable.

During those first three weeks, I experienced something I’ve heard about a hundred times but never understood: cold sweats. This is when you wake up at night shivering in a puddle of perspiration. It’s an odd experience, but it had a benefit. I lost 18 pounds and I’m back to fitting in my “skinny” pants.

We’ve all heard that losing weight is helpful in lessening joint pain. As this clip explains, one of the advantages of losing weight after a knee operation is that for every pound you lose, you reduce the strain on your knees by four pounds. (And the stress on your hips by six.)

Briefly Noted 

* The science behind sound therapy. Click here.

* Birds: A secret weapon in your fight against anxiety. Click here.

* The Booze Effect: What happens when you stop at one glass of wine a day? Click here.

Second Sleep? What’s That?

I was surprised to learn this: For most of man’s time on earth, sleep happened in two shifts. The current “normal” of one seven- or eight-hour sleep was something that developed during the Industrial Revolution.

That’s the conclusion of this very interesting short history of the research that led to this discovery. Click here.