Our book, Central American Modernism, continues to get critical acclaim from influential people in the art world…

The digital magazine Carátula recently published 2 enthusiastic articles about the book that Suzanne and I worked so hard to put together and publish. The articles appeared in a special issue commemorating the 200th anniversary of Central America’s independence from Spain.

Continue Reading

Finally… Everything You’ll Ever Need to Know About

Roman Architecture, Pt. 1: Ancient vs. Classical 

Rome is my favorite city to indulge my curiosity. During a 15-minute stroll, you can pass the foundation of a temple built prior to the birth of Christ, a massive temple built during the Roman Empire, a medieval cloister, and a 16th century palace.

So how do you know what you’re looking at?

Let’s begin with the two earliest periods:

* Ancient Roman Architecture – built in Rome from the founding of the Roman Republic in 509 BC until the transition to the Roman Empire in 27 BC

* Classical Roman Architecture – built in Rome from 27 BC until the city was sacked by the Vandals and then the Goths in 476 AD and the Empire collapsed

Ancient Roman Architecture (509 BC to 27 BC) 

The first thing to know about Ancient Roman architecture is that it was basically a knockoff of Ancient Greek architecture. (As Horace said: “Captive Greece took captive her savage conqueror and brought the arts to rustic Latium.” Or, more eloquently, as my brother Andrew, a Greek and Latin scholar, once put it: “In Conquering Greece, Rome was itself conquered.”)

You can find lots of Ancient Roman temples in the Roman Forum, that vast field of antiquity that sits in the middle of the city. The buildings are only fragments of what they once were. But still…

The above image shows a small slice of the Forum. See all those columns? Do you see how they are holding up those horizontal slabs of marble?

That’s an example of trabeated or post-and-lintel construction. It was the defining feature of both Ancient Greek and Ancient Roman architecture.

Here’s the Parthenon on the Acropolis in Athens. It gives you a better idea of how these post-and-lintel buildings looked:

And to show you how they looked back in their prime, with the white marble painted in bright colors, here is a digitally enhanced image of the first Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus on the Capitoline Hill in Rome:

Now let’s move on to…

Classical Roman Architecture (27 BC to 476 AD) 

There were three technological developments during this period that defined the Classical Roman style: the perfection of concrete, the dome, and the Roman arch.

Roman Concrete 

 The Romans didn’t invent concrete.(It had been used in Mesopotamia. But they improved it.

Roman concrete was a mixture of lime mortar, ash, water, and stones of various sizes. It was strong and durable – stronger and more durable than much of the concrete that is used today. And that is why so many Classical Roman buildings – as opposed to Ancient Roman buildings – are still standing, all over Rome and throughout the parts of Europe that had been conquered by the Roman Empire.

Roman concrete was so solid and strong that, unlike post-and-lintel, it could be used for structurally complex forms. And that paved the way for a second technological breakthrough: the dome.

The Dome 

The dome made it possible for the Romans to construct buildings with wide open interior spaces. The best example of this is the Pantheon.

This is what the Pantheon looks like if you approach it at ground level:

The front is a Greek-style portico, with columns topped by a triangular pediment. But that is just a very small part of the building, as you can see in this aerial shot:

Because it allowed for an immense interior space, it is the dome that makes the Pantheon so spectacular.

 

The Roman Arch 

Post-and-lintel construction is very simple. The weight above the lintel is entirely supported by the posts. And the span of the opening between the posts is determined by the strength of the lintel. Posts and lintels were typically made from hardwood timbers or hard stone. Thus, the size of a post-and-lintel building (both in height and length) was limited to what those materials could support.

But the Roman arch supports the weight above it very differently. Through the keystone (at the top), the weight is distributed downwards (onto the foundation) and outwards (towards the walls) at the same time.

 

As a result, you didn’t need huge amounts of marble and timber to build big. You could do it with brick walls and arches.

And since ordinary stone and bricks are more readily available than hardwood timbers and marble, the construction of buildings became much easier and cheaper, and possible to do anywhere. You didn’t need to be near a hardwood forest or a marble quarry.

Thus, the Romans were able to build miles of aqueducts to carry water to their cities. Here’s an example:

And here’s an example of how the Roman arch was used support the enormous weight of not just one but 4 levels:

(Yes, that’s the Colosseum you are looking at.)

The main things to remember about this period of Roman architecture: 

* Post-and-lintel construction is the defining technology of Ancient Greek and Ancient Roman architecture. It is what gives the buildings their shape (mostly rectangular) and style (lots of columns).

* Three architectural innovations separate Ancient Roman architecture from Classical Roman architecture: the perfection of concrete, the dome, and the Roman arch. The Romans used these technologies to build an empire of thousands of public, military, and religious buildings, from Italy to France, Germany, and England, and all the way to Turkey. The used them to build aqueducts, bridges, and dams; amphitheaters, temples, and palaces.

* When you see rectangular buildings with post-and-lintel construction (columns and overhead slabs of marble), you’re looking at Ancient Greek or Ancient Roman architecture. When you see domes and arches, its Classical Roman.

Continue Reading

JM sent me this after reading what I said about Jennifer Hudson’s amazing singing in my review of the movie Respect.

This is another amazing performance by another Jennifer – Jennifer Holliday – singing “And I Am Telling You” from Dreamgirls:

Continue Reading

The Art of Playing Defense: How to Get Ahead by Not Falling Behind 

236 pages

Published May 18, 2021 by Lioncrest Publishing

In The Art of Playing Defense, Whitney Tilson talks about what it takes to have a full and rewarding life.

From the introduction:

To be successful and enjoy a happy life, it’s important to do all the right things: Become well-educated and wise, develop a strong work ethic, always act with integrity, and treat others well.

What’s equally important (but widely overlooked) is avoiding the calamities that can cause you to suffer, go back to square one, or worst of all, die a premature death.

I’m a fan of Whitney Tilson. Ever since he began writing for one of my client companies several years ago, I’ve been enjoying his blog posts on the economy, the pandemic, and finance. He’s smart. He’s knowledgeable.  He’s experienced. But most impressive to me, he’s not a conventional thinker. His views on topics ranging from investing to politics to physical fitness are often very different from mine.

And that’s what I’m liking about The Art of Playing Defense. When he states something that I agree with, it makes me feel smart. When he says something I disagree with, I feel even smarter.

 

Critical Reception: 

I couldn’t find any “official” reviews for this book, but here are a few reviews posted by readers on Amazon:

* “Tilson efficiently packs a ton of wisdom about risk taking and intelligently avoiding preventable disaster…. Highly recommended!”

* “Whitney gives great practical advice on how NOT TO MESS UP your life by controlling what you can control. Quick read, definitely worth it for the less conventional wisdom that you don’t often read.”

* “I enjoyed the numerous insights Tilson provided – from the importance of judgement often coming from ‘your worst 1%’ to how to find, engage, and build a long-term relationship with a mentor to the benefits of becoming a learning machine. Great advice, and definitely worth a read!”

And from Alison Tilson, the author’s 25-year-old daughter: “My dad’s ‘12 Questions to Ask Before You Marry Someone’ list has helped me boil down the most important qualities to look for in a life partner. He has instilled in me that picking the right person is critical to my happiness in life. I know that his list will help me make that all-important decision someday!”

Continue Reading

Erin Brockovich 

Released March 17, 2000

Available on Amazon Prime and other streaming services

Directed by Steven Soderbergh

Starring Julia Roberts, Albert Finney, Aaron Eckhart

It had been 20 years since I had seen Erin Brockovich. I remembered it as a feel-good movie, and I half-remembered having a negative opinion of it. But I’ve been nostalgic lately for classic and vintage movies. I hit “Play.”

On this second go-around, Erin Brockovich held up quite well. It was engaging, entertaining, and even a tad inspiring. I tried to recall what it was that I didn’t like about it the first time I saw it. It was only after finding two negative reviews of the movie – one by A.O. Scott and another by Roger Ebert (see below) that I remembered: I felt the entire thing was too Hollywood. Too contrived, too simplistic, etc.

I didn’t feel that way about it this time. I don’t deny the criticism. This is not, by any means, a great movie. It does not, for example, teach us anything we don’t already know (like corporate greed exists) or dive deeply into the human condition. But it is a moving story made into a polished and successful Hollywood product. At this time in my movie-consuming life, I’m okay with that.

Erin Brockovich is a legal drama based on a fascinating true story about a legal assistant (Brockovich) who waged war against Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) over groundwater contamination at one of its plants. The acting is terrific. The direction is invisible (i.e., good). And it’s chock full of emotionally tasty little bits. (One that should be included in the Hall of Fame of Movie Clips: Brockovich rebuffing a dismissive comment by a consulting attorney by reciting, verbatim, the phone numbers and personal details of all of the clients she had developed files on.)

Given the subject matter, the success of this movie depends greatly on the performance of Julia Roberts. And she is very, very good. Ably supported by Albert Finney as head of the small legal firm she works for, and by Aaron Eckhart as her motorcycle boyfriend/nanny to her children, Roberts is in almost every scene and makes every scene work.

I found it impossible not to compare the character she created for this role to the one she brought to the screen in Pretty Woman. In both movies, she plays a woman who is unsophisticated but also quick-witted and emotionally intelligent. In Pretty Woman, she plays a cliché – the prostitute with a heart of gold. For Erin Brockovich, her character’s personality is just as compelling but more complex.

Most critics share that view. For her portrayal of Brockovich, Roberts became the first actress to win an Academy Award, a BAFTA Award, a Critic’s Choice Movie Award, a Golden Globe, a National Board of Review Award, and a Screen Actors Guild Award for a single performance.

 

Critical Reception 

* “Julia Roberts is flat out terrific in Erin Brockovich.” (David Ansen, Newsweek)

* “Julia Roberts carries the film in the best sense, by taking us on a human journey of genuine discovery and growth.” (Jack Mathews, New York Daily News)

* There is obviously a story here, but Erin Brockovich doesn’t make it compelling. The film lacks focus and energy, the character development is facile and thin.” (Roger Ebert)

* “After proving, for about 40 minutes, what a marvelous actress she can be, Ms. Roberts spends the next 90 content to be a movie star. As the movie drags on, her performance swells to bursting with moral vanity and phony populism.” (A.O. Scott, the NYT)

 

Interesting Facts

I’m not sure why I didn’t do this the first time I saw the movie, but after watching it this time I did a bit of research. Some of the tidbits I found:

* According to Brockovich’s website, the film “is probably 98% accurate.”

* Since winning her case against Pacific Gas and Electric, Brockovich went on to have a very successful career as an anti-pollution advocate.

* The movie suggests that the real Erin Brockovich was poorly educated but smart and articulate. It is true that she did not have a college degree, but she did have an associate degree of fine arts from Wade College in Texas. And it is not surprising that she was (is) smart and articulate: Her family was well educated. Her father was an engineer and her mother was a journalist.

* Yes, she won a beauty pageant. After working as a management trainee for Kmart in 1981, she entered the Miss Pacific Beauty Pageant and won. But she did not pursue beauty as a career.

* The PG&E case was settled in 1996 for $333 million, the largest settlement ever paid in a direct-action lawsuit in US history. Masry & Viititoe, the law firm for which Brockovich was a legal clerk, received $133 million on that settlement.

You can watch the trailer for the movie here.

Continue Reading

Fusing beatbox with street dance, “The Missing Element” was commissioned for the Guggenheim’s Works & Process project to marry the cypher, widely found in rap, beatbox, and breakdancing, with the circular architecture of the museum.

Continue Reading

Bits and Pieces

GOOD: Recommended by Tim Ferriss – an essay in three parts by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, a Nigerian author whose books include We Should All Be Feminists. Ferriss says: “Everyone should read this essay. It’s a taste of things to come on a much larger scale. Social media will breed more of this, and few people are immune.” Click here.

BAD: On September 29, the National School Boards Association (NSBA), which represents more than 90,000 school boards in the US, called on the Biden administration to “protect its members” from “angry mobs” of parents who have been attending school board meetings and objecting to mask mandates for children, pornographic content in grammar school libraries, and the teaching of critical race theory in class. They argued that such parents were guilty of hate crimes and should be considered domestic terrorists, and asked that federal agencies such as the FBI, the Secret Services, and the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security “investigate, intercept, and prevent the current threats and acts of violence” by whatever “extraordinary measures” necessary.

The Biden administration must have thought that was a terrific idea. The very next week, the president instructed the Justice Department to employ the FBI and other agencies to get to work. Click here.

QUESTIONABLE: Amazon Studios has mandated a hiring cap on white actors and production staff for its movies and streaming shows. This is part of a general effort to diversify its employees and provide more opportunities for people of color and other minorities. As a result,  program producers are now required to list the races, ethnicities, and genders of all cast and crew.

David Cole, a contributing columnist to Taki’s Magazine, posed as a producer to ask the company leadership: “In what column do I put my Jewish actors and crew? Are they in the white column, and therefore part of the capped talent, or are they in the nonwhite column, therefore counting toward the mandated quota?”

That was more than a month ago. So far, he’s gotten no response.

GOOD: Female student athletes fight back against the Woke mob pushing transgender competitors in biological women’s sports. Click here.

BAD: Is this the sort of person we want in charge of our banking system? Click here.

BRAVE: Alpha male tennis legend stands his ground. Click here.

 

Where are the workers? Where are the men? 

 DS, a friend, is the CEO of a substantial restaurant chain. Last week, she sent me a note explaining how her business, like almost all restaurant businesses, is suffering due to a lack of workers. “With rates of pay sky high, unprecedented benefits, and $1,000 signing bonuses,” she wrote, “I am at a loss when it comes to helping my company get back in the black.”

The COVID shutdown and government bailout and bribery programs that followed are to blame for the fact that tens of millions of Americans are not currently interested in working. That will change as these programs close. But what won’t likely change is something more sinister: a rising sense of income entitlement among young people, and among young men in particular.

Too many young people today don’t feel an obligation to take care of their financial responsibilities, including paying their bills and their debts. They don’t feel morally bound to earn an income. If they can find a meaningful job that can satisfy their “passions,” they will work – so long as the requirements aren’t too demanding. But if they can’t find such a job, they don’t feel like they should work.

In her note to me, DS attached a report on the US labor situation that contained a startling fact: 30% of all working-age men in America aren’t working. This is both amazing and disturbing. Think about it: 1 out of every 3 working-age men in the US is not working.

And here’s another fact: This trend – fewer working-age males working – has been going on for more than 70 years. The participation rate for men in the US workforce peaked in 1949 at 87.4%, and has been dropping steadily ever since. It now stands at 67.7%.‌

 

6 Engineering Marvels That Changed History 

I thought this was interesting – from the History Channel website…

  1. Transcontinental Railroad

View of construction of the Union Pacific section of the Transcontinental Railroad across Devil’s Gate Bridge, Utah, 1869 (PhotoQuest/Getty Images) 

While the Civil War was still raging in the East, work began in the West to build a railroad that would link the United States from coast to coast. Authorized by the 1862 Pacific Railroad Act, the Central Pacific Railroad Company laid tracks eastward from Sacramento, California, while the Union Pacific Railroad Company moved west from Omaha, Nebraska. The railway facilitated the country’s westward expansion by cutting cross-country travel times from months to under a week. READ MORE

  1. New York and Boston Subways

Construction workers in a tunnel of the New York City subway, (Philippe Clement/Arterra/Universal Images Group/Getty Images) 

With horse-drawn carriages clogging the streets of New York City and Boston and elevated trains raining soot down on pedestrians, civic leaders sought a transportation alternative that was faster and cleaner. They turned to a radical solution – underground train travel, which many Americans viewed as impractical and dangerous. Boston opened the first American subway in 1897. New York followed seven years later. Both cities employed a cut-and-cover construction method to minimize disruption to city life. With the world’s first subway in London still using steam-powered locomotives, the American systems differed in employing electrically powered trains. The advent of rapid transit redefined Boston, New York and American cities to follow.

  1. Panama Canal

A shovel vehicle operates during the construction of the Panama Canal, c. 1906 (Hulton Archive/Getty Images) 

Linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the 51-mile Panama Canal transformed global trade routes when it opened in 1914. After a failed attempt by the French in the 1880s, the United States tried again in 1904, jettisoning the earlier design from a sea-level canal for one that used locks and damned up the Chagres River to create the world’s largest man-made lake at the time. Ten percent of the 56,000 workers who toiled on the project between 1904 and 1913 died. Perhaps the most remarkable feat? The international ship channel was completed on time and on budget. READ MORE

4. The Golden Bridge

Workers on the catwalks bundling the cables during the construction of the cables of the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California, c. 1936 (Underwood Archives/Getty Images) 

The world’s longest suspension bridge for 27 years after its 1937 opening, the 1.7-mile Golden Gate Bridge soars above the nearly 400-foot-deep strait connecting San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Containing enough cable to circle the globe three times, the bridge can move more than two feet laterally to withstand the strait’s strong winds. Chief engineer Joseph Strauss prioritized safety by putting a safety net beneath the bridge that saved the lives of 19 workers. READ MORE

5. Hoover Dam

View inside one of the 50-foot-high Hoover Dam concrete tunnels, showing the grouting process in operation in Diversion Tunnel No. 4, through which the Colorado River would be diverted (George Rinhart/Corbis/Getty Images) 

Built by an army of more than 21,000 workers, the 60-story-tall Hoover Dam was the world’s largest concrete structure and highest dam at the time it was dedicated in 1935. The project, which required the Colorado River’s diversion through four excavated tunnels, finished two years ahead of schedule. The arch-gravity dam on the Arizona-Nevada border controls the flow of the Colorado River, stores enough water to irrigate 2 million acres and powers more than 1 million homes with hydroelectricity and propelled the development of cities such as Las Vegas and Phoenix and created Lake Mead, the largest reservoir in the United States in terms of water capacity. READ MORE

  1. Interstate Highway System

Aerial photo of San Francisco, c. July 1959, showing the Highway 101 and Interstate 280 interchange still under construction (Duke Downey/San Francisco Chronicle/Getty Images) 

President Eisenhower spearheaded passage of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which authorized the construction of 41,000 miles of expressways with controlled ramp-based access and no at-grade intersections. This was at the time the largest public works project in world history. The Interstate Highway System transformed the American economy and way of life by spurring the growth of suburbs while also decimating certain urban neighborhoods. READ MORE

 

Personal Productivity Advice From F. Scott Fitzgerald 

 One of the most important lessons I ever learned about personal productivity was that I could accomplish much more if I spent the first hour or two of my day focusing on my goals that were truly important. I was surprised to discover recently that none other than F. Scott Fitzgerald had given the very same advice to his daughter in a letter he wrote to her on April 18, 1938:

If you will trust my scheme of making a mental habit of doing the hard thing first, when you are absolutely fresh, and I mean doing the hardest thing first at the exact moment that you feel yourself fit for doing anything in any particular period, morning, afternoon or evening, you will go a long way toward mastering the principle of concentration.

 

3 Words I’m Trying to Work Into My Conversations 

* profligacy: extravagance

* pusillanimous: cowardly

* cynosure: focus

From Michael Masterson… 

When deliberating any important decision, ask yourself 4 questions:

* What is the best possible outcome?

* What is the worst?

* Would I be happy with the best outcome?

* Could I live with the worst?

Continue Reading

Old Men Golfing

I’m in Myrtle Beach this week, golfing with some old friends. We were old friends – in the sense of having known one another for many years – when we began this yearly reunion in the 1990s. Now, in our septuagenarian years, we are old friends in both senses. And we look like it. And act like it.

There are many indignities that come with aging. Not being able to drive a golf ball 250 yards is the least of them. One that I noticed on this trip is the brief humiliation of getting into an SUV. For most of my life this was accomplished in a single movement that took a nanosecond of time. But it’s gradually morphed into an athletic challenge of four parts: grabbing, hoisting, pivoting, and landing safely. Of these, the hoisting is the most demanding, sometimes requiring two or three efforts.

Although the ostensible purpose of this trip is golfing, the reason we do it year after year must be something other than that. I say that because the golfing – well, it’s just not that much fun. Yes, we are out in the fresh air. Yes, we are surrounded by natural beauty. Yes, we can drink beer or smoke pot while playing. But ultimately golf is a solitary game whose objective is to pretend you are having fun when you are demonically possessed with the impossible goal of making each game you play the best you have ever played and each stroke you take a form of physical perfection.

No one that plays golf and values honesty will deny it: Golf is a sinister, psychological game of wishful dreams and self-deception, false promises and bad judgements, and of confronting oneself, time and again, with the limits of one’s abilities versus the boundlessness of one’s foolishness.

It is the only game I know where every player – regardless of how he is playing – stops at least once during a round to tell himself, “You suck! You suck! You f***ing suck!”

No, it’s not for the pleasure of playing golf that we assemble in Myrtle Beach each year. It’s for the pleasure of the company. Eight of the 12 of us have been friends since high school (class of 1968). Over the years, we have stayed in touch, with lapses of a year or two to go to war or earn degrees or fall in love or have children and grow families. But here we are again.

Enduring friendships, I’ve long believed, are often formed from shared experiences of suffering or struggle. The example that comes quickest to mind is the bond that forms among soldiers in war. There is also the connection formed between teammates fortunate enough to experience an annus mirabilis. For some it is the experience of growing up in the wrong side of town, of wearing the wrong clothes, of having the wrong parents or no parents, and of the social stigma that comes with that. And these humiliations are most acute when one’s emotions are the most fragile – which is, for most of us, in adolescence.

The high school years are transformative for most children. As much or more so, I think, than the early, Freudian years. This is the transition time from child to young adult, when every small triumph or failure is felt in magnification and where the culture itself is one of hierarchy and exclusion, where few are chosen, and the rest are reminded that they are not. What typically happens is the formation of social tribes at every level of the social hierarchy. For us, it was fraternities.

I’m not sure if any other parts of the country ever had high school fraternities, but on Long Island during the 1960s and 1970s, every public high school had two or three. Each had its own symbols and colors. Each had its own rules. Each had its own culture. Fraternities were essentially suburban gangs without guns.

The unifying feature of every fraternity was the very primitive initiation ritual of “pledging” – six weeks of humiliation and pain sorted out by older boys for the purpose of separating, literally, the men from the boys.

The physical  pain was largely restricted to “paddling” – i.e., getting your ass beat with something like a cricket bat – often beyond the point of pink cheeks. On “Hell Night,” for example ,there was often bleeding. And as PW reminded me yesterday, the beatings themselves were ritualized. It went like this: A pledge does something wrong. (Or doesn’t. It didn’t matter.) A brother tells him to, “assume the position.” “Assuming the position” meant bending over while cupping one’s testicles, to protect against the worst, and getting a whack on the behind. After the whack, the pledge is required to shout, military style, “Thank you, sir! May I have another?”

And then there were the humiliations.  Oh, the endless creativity of the humiliations! From eating goldfish to being walked like a dog (“the dog you are”) in public to cleaning shoes with one’s tongue to naked, on the knees, marshmallow races. (If you don’t know, you don’t want to ask.)

These were, as I said, initiation rituals. And they were fundamentally the same as initiation rituals have been for thousands of years. They were the same and served the same purpose as the initiation rites of the Green Berets or Navy Seals. Or the initiation rituals of urban and prison gangs today. Minus the felonies. And, by the way, they worked. They accomplished what they were designed to do: create a band of brothers.

These aren’t necessarily deep relationships. But they tend to be enduring because they are based on a common experience of striving and struggling and, ultimately, surviving. By staying in touch, it somehow validates all the pain and suffering, and extends, however attenuated, the rich experience of living in a community of acceptance and loyalty and a sort of fraternal love.

I may be making this seem more serious than it is. Our time together in Myrtle Beach is far from a therapy session. If anything, the unspoken rule is: Keep it light. We may occasionally get into a philosophical discussion, but most of the conversations are favored anecdotes of our halcyon days, golf stories, good-natured teasing, and unbearably corny jokes.

So, we come together every October, and we play golf on the beautiful courses of Myrtle Beach. And we curse our bad play and rue our senescence and come back to our rented beachfront house at sunset to sit on the porch, stare at the ocean, sip whiskey, smoke cigars, and tell our stories.

We don’t know if the stories are true anymore. We’ve heard them so often, they feel true, and that is enough. We sometimes disagree. And when we do, we may shout. But we never fight. Because when all is said and done, we recognize that we still want, and maybe still need, the comfort and comradery of fraternity.

Continue Reading

Old Man Humor 

Another indignity of old age is the disintegration of critical skills, particularly when it comes to humor. In between our yearly get togethers, the 12 of us stay in touch by email, exchanging what is commonly known as old man humor.

These are actual examples:

Continue Reading