I got an email from a friend – a successful, well-educated man. He shares many of my views on economics and business, but his views on public health are what I’d call “conventional.” Which means that he has always thought my ideas about COVID – the virus, the government reaction, and the vaccines – were crazy.

Attached to his email was an article published in a mainstream media outlet arguing that the “facts” promoted in 2020 through 2023 by the World Health Organization, the NIH, and the CDC were basically valid – that COVID was a deadly virus and that the shutdown of our economy and the mandates on masks and distancing and vaccinations saved millions of lives.

I was going to dissect and dismember the article. It would have been easy because it was so full of factual errors and long-since-disproven claims. But I thought that rather than spend a half-hour on that I’d spend a few hours collecting the many reports being published these days that support my position – especially my belief that the vaccines did more harm than good.

So, that’s what I did last night. I spent about four hours putting together no fewer than 30 reports on no fewer than 20 recent studies – all of which were scientifically valid and half of which were based on sizeable populations. And then, when I went to save it, the damn thing somehow disappeared!

I spent another hour and a half unsuccessfully trying to retrieve it before I realized that any attempt to help my friend see the truth by overwhelming him with evidence would be futile. Like many major public issues today, the debate on the lethality of COVID and the effectiveness of the vaccines has been, for most people, rooted in personal political prejudices, all of which are supported regularly by bad or good data and arguments located and delivered based on algorithmic fingerprints.

So, following that logic, I decided that, instead, I should be writing a piece about why I’m not going to bother to write about the COVID story anymore.

But by a happy coincidence, one of the COVID-related articles that slipped into my inbox this morning was a new report on “all-cause mortality studies” – which, because I didn’t fully understand how important they can be in the vaccine debate, I hadn’t included in my previous reporting.

“Hell,” I thought, “let me give it another try.”

And so I did.

But before I get into that, here’s something that might help to bring my friend over to my side on COVID, even if he isn’t willing to consider the all-cause mortality argument…

I read yesterday that Kash Patel said that he and his team had uncovered evidence that almost everything the government health organizations and mainstream media have been telling the public for five years was wrong. Not just wrong, but consciously propagated bullshit.

His team is in possession of documents and communications showing that officials in government agencies worked with Big Pharma lobbyists and liaisons to suppress critical information – about the virus’s origins, vaccine safety, and even effective treatments – that was brushed aside.

“The full story will be revealed soon,” Patel promised, and “it’s going to shake up a lot of people’s beliefs about this entire pandemic.”

We’ve been promised full reports before that haven’t materialized, so I’m going to hope for the best but prepare for worst by assuming that none of that info will see the light of day – and by doing the next best thing, which is to publish and explain the ugly facts as they are exposed.

Which brings me to this…

Can All-Cause Mortality Studies Answer 
the Ultimate Question About the COVID Vaccines? 

A week ago, I received three separate reports from health bloggers I follow on a major study conducted in Japan and released in June 2025 on a data set of 18 million Japanese people who got the COVID vaccine.

It was an all-cause mortality study, which is a very reliable way to measure the effects of any number of factors on mortality rates, from lifestyle choices, to environmental conditions, to underlying health issues, and, yes, to vaccines.

About All-Cause Mortality Studies 

All-cause mortality is an objective endpoint without bias. The occurrence of death should be assessed through standard study processes and through supplemental interrogation of administrative registry databases to minimize the number of patients lost to follow-up and the need for imputation or sensitivity analyses. Factors contributing to the cause of death may be difficult to establish, and the relationship of death to the underlying MV disease or to the intervention may be uncertain.

For these reasons, all-cause mortality is preferable compared with cardiac mortality as a primary endpoint measure. Nonetheless, adjudication of the cause of death should be performed using pre-defined criteria.

The cause of death is subdivided into cardiovascular and noncardiovascular causes. Although categorizing the initiating or proximate cause of cardiovascular death may be difficult, major complications contributing to death should be identified to facilitate future efforts to reduce mortality. A diagnosis of noncardiovascular death requires the primary cause to be clearly related to another condition (e.g., trauma, cancer, or suicide). All deaths that are not unequivocally related to a noncardiovascular condition are considered cardiovascular death for regulatory purposes. (Source: Science Direct]

What the data showed was a significant correlation to all-cause mortality rates in Japan in the months following mass vaccinations.

Summarizing the findings, Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, who works at the Tokyo University of Science, one of Japan’s top RNA research centers, and is the author of more than 100 scientific papers, said that the data showed a clear pattern: The more doses of the vaccine a person got, the sooner they were likely to die after their last shot.

The steepest spike was after three doses. Those who got three doses were most likely to die about 90 to 120 days after their last shot date.

But as Dr. Murakami noted, non-vaccinated people never experienced a peak in deaths.

To give you an idea of how many studies have been done on the COVID vaccine, here are five that I dug up in the last five minutes.

1. “All-cause mortality according to COVID-19 vaccination status: An analysis of the UK Office for National Statistics public data.” Click here.

2. “The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.” Click here. 

3. “Age-specific all-cause mortality trends in the UK: Pre-pandemic increases and the complex impact of COVID-19.” Click here.

4. “Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data.” Click here.

5. “Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.” Click here.

FDA Reports on Myocarditis Risks from COVID Vaccines

This year, the FDA provided important updates on the risk of myocarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, noting the risk is higher in young men.
Watch time: 15 minutes
Click here.

The Vaccine Trials: More Harm Than Disclosed

If you believe the vaccines are safe, you won’t like this. It’s not science, but it’s scary.
Watch time: 1 hour, 15 minutes
Click here.

Japanese Prove Excess Deaths in Vaccinated

Dr. John Campbell, a thoughtful man who has been following the COVID story since it began, discusses the Japanese study I discussed in this issue.
Watch time: 16 minutes
Click here.

The Question I’m Asking Now 

I’m doubtful we’ll ever get a full and clear accounting of the Mega-Crime that was COVID-19. There are simply too many power players – corporations, lobbyists, medical associations, politicians, and the media – involved in producing and promoting this multibillion-dollar scam that will continue to do everything they can to challenge the facts as they surface or simply bury them in the small print of long, boring reports that no one will read.

We know that the virus itself was not just man-made but was produced by labs that were in the business of developing biological warfare. And it never would have existed in the first place – and killed as many as 8.5 million people worldwide – had the US not been actively involved in funding that research.

What we know we do not know is the actual number of deaths from COVID. Because from the very beginning, the way the WHO and many other national health agencies counted the deaths was erratic and completely absurd.

On the economic front, we know that the cost to governments, businesses, and individuals was in the trillions of dollars.

And finally, we know (or should have learned) that the power of our own limited-government US Constitution was not strong enough to persuade a huge percentage of our population to believe a narrative that made no sense when it was first spun at the end of 2019, and only got more absurd as the shutdowns continued.

So the question I’m asking now is: Did we, the people, learn anything from this? Or could it happen to us again next year?

 

One More Thing: This Just Came Out from the WSJ…

As I was putting this issue to bed, the WSJ published an opinion piece titled “RFK’s Misguided War on mRNA.” The Journal has been promoting every major talking point put out by Big Pharma since the man-made virus appeared six years ago. It’s no surprise that they continue today. I don’t have the time right now to give you a point-by-point refutation of their piece, but I’ll send one to you in the coming days.

From GM: “Thought you’d enjoy hearing about the achievements of one of your students!” 

“Alex Hormozi and I are students of your books, and I knew you’d love to hear about the Aug. 17 launch of his new book: $100M Money Models. It broke the Guinness World Record for ‘fastest sales of a nonfiction book within a 24-hour period’ – 2,970,443 copies sold in that short time!

“The book covers the series of offers an entrepreneur or salesperson can make to attract, upsell, downsell, or convert a prospect on a first transaction and back-end offers + continuity programs. In other words, tactical methods similar to the middle parts of your book, Ready, Fire, Aim.”

My Response: Congratulations to Alex on the success of his book launch. It’s big news in the internet marketing and entrepreneurship world.

 

From GF re my piece on “What I’m Doing with My Money” in the Aug. 13 issue: 

“Just a note to say I thought this piece was excellent. And though many will not appreciate the transparency, or the clarity of thought, it’s a pleasure to see.”

A Post-COVID Musical Elegy

Peter Frampton, Trey Anastasio, and Grace Bowers performed a really powerful cover of the classic George Harrison song “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” during the Love Rocks 2025 concert at the Beacon Theater in New York City. Watch it here.