This essay and others are available for syndication.
Contact Us for more information.

Happy Independence Day!

We honor our country’s founders with a day of celebration each year that includes flags, marching bands, and fireworks. And we celebrate our homosexual, nonbinary, and trans communities with a full month of those sorts of things on steroids.

Now that I think about it, I must have been out of the country when these honorariums were put into the Congressional Record. I wonder how they pulled it off. I think that, whatever one thinks of old White men, one has to acknowledge they should be given a month, too!

Speaking of Independence Day, did you know that…

The Declaration of Independence wasn’t signed on July 4, 1776?

And one of the signers later recanted?

Click here for seven more bits of July 4 trivia that might come in handy today.

Continue Reading

John Adams, in a letter to his wife, Abigail, after signing the Declaration of Independence: 

“I am apt to believe that it [the signing] will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, illuminations from one end of the continent to the other from this time forward forever more.”

Continue Reading

Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow 

By Yuval Noah Harari

448 pages

Originally published in 2015

The first book of Harari’s that I read was Sapiens. I loved it. It’s one of those books that gives pleasure on almost every page. And there are 448 pages. In it, Harari takes readers on a tour of the history of Homo sapiens (intelligent humans), divided into four periods:

  1. The Cognitive Revolution (c. 70,000 BCE, when imagination evolved in Homo sapiens)
  2. The Agricultural Revolution (c. 10,000 BCE, the development of agriculture)
  3. The Unification of Humankind (c. 34 CE, the gradual consolidation of political organizations towards one global empire)
  4. The Scientific Revolution (c. 1543 CE, the emergence of objective science)

I next read Harari’s 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, which seems to be a collection of clever but somewhat random ideas he had about the state of the world that he wanted to get down on paper. That book was solid, but not great.

With Homo Deus, Harari is back to his strength. As the subtitle cleverly suggests, it is a wide-ranging commentary about all the amazing things that are happening today, with a brief history of how they came about (mostly taken from Sapiens) and a look at what they will look like in the future. And “the future,” as he reminds us, could be next month.

His central argument is that it took millions of years for apes to evolve into Homo sapiens via the tedious mechanism of evolution through natural selection, and that has changed. Natural selection is being replaced by machine learning, AI, and other forms of intelligent design that are much faster (and become geometrically faster every year). Homo sapiens’ next stage of development – the “Homo deus” of the title – will be taking on the characteristics that traditional societies attributed to gods.

With the recent developments in AI technology, this book couldn’t be a more timely read. A question it is trying to answer: What effect will it have on the world?

For example:

* What will happen to democracy when Google and Facebook come to know our likes and our political preferences better than we know them ourselves?

* What will happen to the welfare state when computers push humans out of the job market and create a massive new “useless class”?

* Will Silicon Valley end up producing new religions, rather than just novel gadgets?

Critical Reception 

I didn’t know this when I read Sapiens, but Harari is generally thought poorly of in academic circles. In preparing this review, I read a few such critiques and they were sort of obnoxiously dismissive.

For example, from Christopher Robert Halpike on Sapiens in 2020: “One has often had to point out how surprisingly little [Harari] seems to have read on quite a number of essential topics. It would be fair to say that whenever his facts are broadly correct they are not new, and whenever he tries to strike out on his own he often gets things wrong, sometimes seriously.”

And on July 22, 2022, Current Affairs published “The Dangerous Populist Science of Yuval Noah Harari,” an article arguing that his books were short on scientific proof: “The bestselling author is a gifted storyteller and popular speaker. But he sacrifices science for sensationalism, and his work is riddled with error.”

Here’s What I Think 

Academics don’t like Harari because he understands and exposes their game of branding ideas that don’t support their leftist views as unscientific and factually inaccurate. What they really mean is: “Don’t even bother to read Harari. You may find him interesting, but his books will damage you. And you and your children will stop believing in all the bullshit we’ve been paid to teach and write about.”

About Yuval Noah Harari 

Yuval Noah Harari is a historian, philosopher, and bestselling author. (His books have sold 45 million copies in 65 languages.) Currently a professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, he is considered one of the world’s most influential public intellectuals.

Click here to watch him speaking about Homo Deus.

Continue Reading

Astronomy Photographer of the Year 

The short list for the 2023 Astronomy Photographer of the Year has just been published. And, not surprisingly, this year’s selection is just as amazing as last year’s. Looking over the entries, I tried to figure out if I had an affinity for the images that included images of the Earth, or those that were abstract splatter shots of stars in the sky.

The winners will be announced on September 14.

Click here.

Continue Reading

Yizo Yizo 

A TV series directed by Teboho Mahlatsi and Angus Gibson

3 seasons, 39 episodes

Original release: Jan 27, 1999 to July 1, 2004

Currently streaming on Netflix

I would not recommend this series to most of the people I know. Only a few would appreciate it.

For most, Yizo Yizo will be, at best, an odd and vaguely unbelievable portrayal of a group of high school kids in the South African public school system. (It was commissioned by the South African Dept. of Education as part of a campaign to address problems in the schools.) But if you have lived in Africa among Africans, as K and I have, or if you have both an open mind and a strong interest in other cultures, you may feel about this, as I did, like you had discovered a treasure trove of cultural knowledge about Africa, South Africa, and the native tribes in that part of the world.

Critical Reception 

All three seasons of Yizo Yizo had record-breaking audience ratings in South Africa. It won multiple awards internationally and was selected for numerous festivals, including a special screening at Venice 2004.

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

More Enjoyable Than Depp vs. Heard. More Sinister than the Watergate Conspiracy. More Believable Than… Well, You’ll Either Believe It or You Won’t! 

If you are a reader of any city paper whose name includes the word “Times” or a watcher of any news channel starting with a C, you may have heard nothing about the deposition of John Durham.

John Durham 

Here’s the skinny.

John Durham is the special prosecutor chosen in 2020 to examine the FBI’s role in the four-year Congressional investigation into former President Trump’s involvement with Russia’s “interference” in the 2016 elections.

His testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is six hours of drama. And well worth watching. While the Democrat interrogators do their best to discredit Durham, he is remarkably calm and composed in responding to their accusations. He seems to be the trustworthy person without a political agenda that almost everyone agreed he was before he began his investigation.

The scope of the deposition is limited to what Durham found out about the involvement of the FBI. But along the way, all sorts of other things have come out. Like…

* The whole Russiagate investigation had its origin in the Steele Dossier, a document named for the primary source of the material in it that was damaging to Trump.

* Ironically, the Steele Dossier was, in part, Russian disinformation (in that Steele was a Russian agent). But its purpose was to bring down Trump, not Hilary Clinton. It was cooked up prior to 2016 by the Hillary Clinton election campaign to tarnish Trump’s credibility. Many of the facts in it were outright fabricated, and, other than some smaller “gotcha” violations on the part of a few Trump loyalists, there was no solid evidence to back up any of the claims.

* If Trump managed to get elected in 2016, the conspirators had a Plan B. It was to time-release bits and pieces of the dossier, as well as introduce other stories (such as that very weird bit about drinking urine) over the term of Trump’s administration to either get him impeached or, at least, undermine his presidency.

* The Russiagate conspiracy lasted four years and cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars. Nothing came of it because 90% of the “evidence” it was based on turned out to be a document that the author admitted to having created out of whole cloth. And that was obviously known by the people at the top of the misinformation campaign from the very beginning. And certainly, by the time Adam Schiff was working 24/7 trying to make the allegations stick, most of the rest of Congress (including most Democrats) knew it for what it was. But Schiff continued lying to the very end, even after the NYT, CNN, and the other media that treated Russiagate like a genuine scandal had to concede that the whole thing was a big, embarrassing fraud.

* And if all that isn’t enough to give even the most dedicated Biden supporter some pause, it’s now known that the FBI was aiding and abetting the Russiagate conspirators throughout the entirety of Trump’s administration.

In 2020, after the Republicans took control of Congress, they formed a committee to investigate the Steele Dossier and the rest of the Russiagate probe. And for all that time, some very embarrassing (for Democrats) facts have been coming to light. But they were not reported by the mainstream media, so a discussion about the egregiousness and enormity of the story was never had on the public stage.

Thanks to Robert Mueller’s work, many of the facts of the story are out. And they are definitely, as I said, much scarier and crazier than the Watergate facts. But if you research the story today by starting with the Mueller Report, what you’ll find is that 90% of what is being published about it is calling the whole thing a big nothing-burger.

I’ve spent only so many hours looking into this. I’m sure there are facts I’ve missed and perhaps conclusions I’ve drawn that weren’t justified by the facts. Still, it’s difficult not to be stunned by how appalling this has been.

Here is Congresswoman Harriet Hageman talking about her own stunned emotions in sitting through all these revelations.

Of course, if you are a card-carrying member of The Holy Church of Trump Is Satan, you won’t be inclined to find any of this credible. But before you discard it completely, look at this summary of a three-year investigation into the reporting on Russiagate by Jeff Gerth, a Pulitzer-Prize winning NYT reporter.

Will any of this change anyone’s mind? If the Democrats retain the White House and the Senate, this whole amazing story of political corruption will be ignored until it’s forgotten. But even if the Republicans take both houses and the presidency in 2024, there’s no assurance that it will ever be exposed. Because to do that, you need a lot more than testimony and a few jail terms. You need a media that is willing to admit that they had it all wrong from step one.

Continue Reading

In response to the June 30 issue in which I linked to an inspiring story about a high school wrestling champ that saved a woman from an attempted kidnapping, GM wrote:

“I enjoy when you highlight these stories that deserve wider coverage. This Canaan Bower was a remarkable young man who thought nothing about his personal safety to protect strangers. It gives hope for the future in this crazy world. I always read the comments after an item that I find moving and came across this.

“Absolutely heartbreaking! It makes me wonder about everything I believe. Imagine what he could have done and become.”

Continue Reading


"Were it not for hypocrisy I’d have no advice to give."
"Were it not for sciolism I’d have no ideas to share."
"Were it not for arrogance, I’d have no ambition."
"Were it not for forgetfulness, I would have no new ideas to write about."