The Tyre Nichols Killing: Where Should the Conversation Start?

By now, most of America is familiar with the story of the five Memphis policemen that beat to death Tyre Nichols, a 29-year-old man who had been pulled over on Jan. 7 for “reckless driving.”

When I saw the initial reports, I thought, “Oh, boy. Is this another BLM moment? White cops brutalizing unarmed Black men?” But then the photos were released. All five of the accused police were Black.

What to make of it?

I had a good idea of what the polarized, political response would be. The BLM contingent would see it as an effect of structural racism. It doesn’t matter that the cops were Black. They were acting as they’d been conditioned to act. The anti-BLM contingent would point out that this is just another example of Black-on-Black crime.

These arguments are already being voiced loudly in the media. That’s too bad, because I was hoping it would be seen, by both Blacks and Whites, as I saw it. As an example of police brutality, which has been a serious problem in the US for as long as there have been police. A problem that will never be resolved so long as we examine it as a symptom of race.

I asked Sam, an ex-police (and Black) training partner, if he thought this was a hate crime caused by structural or systemic racism.

“It’s not about racism,” he said.

“Then what?” I asked.

“The root problem is cultural,” he said. “Police culture. It’s about isolation, fear, intimidation, and tribalism.”

I nodded.

“It starts at the top,” he said, “with the old guys. And it is handed down, as a cultural norm, to each new class of cadets. It’s invisible. But it’s powerful.”

“Let me ask you this,” I said, “if Nichols were White, do you think this would have happened to him?”

“I’d say the chances would be less. For sure. But in this case, what you have is five Black cops beating a young, unarmed Black man to death. I don’t believe for a minute that they aimed to kill him. They couldn’t have been that stupid.”

“So, what did they mean to do?”

“Exactly what they did. Beat someone who they felt needed a beating.”

“What do you mean?”

“How do I put this? Yes, I think if this kid were White, they might have thought twice about beating him so badly. And you can call that White privilege. But that doesn’t mean the core problem is racism, that Whites are less likely to take a beating than Blacks. If the victim were a Black woman or a Black senior, they would have been at less risk, probably much less risk, than a young Black man. Or even a young White man. What I’m saying is that the core problem here is that these guys felt they had the moral right to beat up someone, anyone, for any reason. That is an educational problem, a cultural problem. The problem is police culture. That’s what needs to change.”

Continue Reading

Bits and Pieces 

A CEO’s Perspective 

Click here for an outlook on the US economy from Starwood Capital CEO Barry Sternlicht. Friend and colleague JS sent this in, saying, “Listen to this CEO as compared to what you hear from politicians.”

Canada’s Drug Experiment 

I generally think of Canada’s prime minister as a leftist lunatic. And Canada’s federal government as lunatic-led zombies. Justin Trudeau is a textbook example of that old saw “Under every leftist is a wannabe tyrant.”

British Columbia is doing something that, from a distance, sounds like more of the same. But, IMHO, it makes sense.

The province is conducting a three-year experiment in decriminalizing drugs. Not pot. (Cannabis is already legal there.) But harder drugs like cocaine and heroin. Drug trafficking will remain legal. But people caught with modest quantities (less than 2.5 grams) will not be arrested or even charged with a crime. Instead, they will be given information on risks and treatments. Read more here.

“Are We Dating the Same Guy?” 

Click here to read an interesting report from The Free Press about a membership website called “Are We Dating the Same Guy?” It’s for women that have concerns about men they have recently dated. The report contains some surprising facts. (Did you know that women comprise more than 70 percent of consumers of crime and murder stories?) But ultimately, it’s scary.

How to Stop Mass Shootings? 

I’m not sure if providing deadly weapons to teachers is the best way to stop mass school shootings. But if you watch this YouTube video, you may begin to think more broadly about the situation. Click here.

Continue Reading

The Banshees of Inisherin 

Written and directed by Martin McDonagh

Starring Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon, and Barry Keoghan

Released in theaters (US) Oct. 21, 2022

Available from several streaming services, including Amazon Prime

BJ, one of my golfing pals, recommended The Banshees of Inisherin in a recent group email. AS, another golfing pal, said it was “dark and disturbing.” JM said he thought it was good in many ways, but confessed that he found it complicated and confusing. “Honestly, I have no idea what it meant.”

I thought: “Sounds interesting. I’m going to love this or hate it.” Last night, I watched it.

The Banshees of Inisherin is, indeed, a complicated movie. It begins as a pastoral period piece, slips into a doleful but warmhearted narrative, and then takes a sharp turn towards a macabre black comedy before resolving itself as an existential tragedy.

What I Liked About It 

* The photography by Ben Davis: beautiful, soft, and sad.

* The music by Carter Burwell: beautiful, soft, and sad.

* The dialog: country Irish. There’s nothing like it.

* The acting by three of the principals: Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon, and Barry Keoghan.

* The mood: Excellent. GSD (grim, stark, and depressing).

What I Didn’t Like (So Much) 

* Colin Farrell’s acting: He was hamstrung by his supremely intelligent good looks. His role was that of a simpleton. He couldn’t pull it off.

* The main plot point: I just couldn’t believe the premise. That after years of friendship, one friend would turn so suddenly and completely away from the other.

* The denouement: The story lacked any sort of satisfying resolution.

* The themes: Several were suggested by the plot and some of the dialog. But the movie lacked one overarching theme that could bring the whole thing together.

My Recommendation 

See it. Definitely, see it. Even with its several considerable flaws, it’s still better than 98 percent of the movies being made today.

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

The denouement (day-NOO-mon) – from the French for the final part of a play, movie, or narrative in which the strands of the plot are drawn together and explained or resolved – literally means “untie the knot.” See how I used it, above, in my review of The Banshees of Inisherin (under “What I Didn’t Like (So Much”).

Continue Reading

Re my series on “The COVID Response” 

From JJ: “Mark, you may be partially right. More important, and probably more closely a cause of lower numbers in Africa: the widespread use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Both were shown to be highly effective in preventing infection and [in preventing the development of] a full-blown case if the person did become sick.

“Read the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. book about Anthony Fauci, which details all the research that doctors and scientists did early in the pandemic, showing that both were indeed effective.”

My Response: Thanks for your note, JJ.

I’m familiar with that theory about Africa’s numbers, and I was excited about it when I heard it. When I wrote about my own theory in the Jan. 31 issue, I hadn’t yet done any research on ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. However, I thought my theory was strong because it was so simple and provable.

Yesterday, I spent several hours researching hydroxychloroquine, looking for studies that would support the notion that it works as a safeguard against or treatment for COVID-19. I didn’t find a thing! Not a single study. On the contrary, everything I saw said that hydroxychloroquine had no discernible benefit at all.

I haven’t yet studied ivermectin. If I find something that supports it, I’ll let you know. In the meantime, if you can find any study that proves Kennedy’s claims, I’d like to read it.

I believe my theory is more accurate than the hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin theories. More importantly, it is more relevant to my overarching thesis that our (the government’s) response to COVID-19 was both hysterically wrong and immensely damaging.

Remember, we have known, almost since the beginning, that COVID-19 was life-threatening almost exclusively to people that were (a) in their 70s and 80s, (b) medically obese, and/or (c) diabetic. Why didn’t the WHO, the CDC, and the US government work to protect that relatively small portion of the population rather than lock down the lives of those for whom COVID was no less dangerous than the common cold?

 

From SA: 

“Why are you wasting your time writing about how many COVID-related deaths occurred in China? You can’t believe a single thing China says. If George Santos were a country, he’d be China.”

My Response: The point I was trying to make was that, during the first year of the pandemic, China’s severe crackdown was frequently touted by some leftist politicians and the mainstream media as a model that the US should follow. At that time, not having the data to prove they were lying, all I could do was point out that China’s mortality rate seemed impossibly low. And that even if they did manage to slow the spread of the virus, it would eventually return and spread widely, since the only way to stop a virus on a countrywide scale is by herd immunity. Today, China is admitting to huge case rates, which proves the second point. I don’t think they will ever admit to the true mortality rates. But again, the point was to mock the stupidity of those that believed China’s data in the first place.

 

From AS: 

“I loved ‘If I didn’t have to go to dinner now, I’d take the time to explain why [China’s official explanation of its recent surge in COVID cases is obviously false].’ It made me laugh. It humanized the writer, you.”

My Response: Thanks, AS. I appreciate that. I always want to convey some amount of humility in my comments, because so many of them are said with some degree of irony or sarcasm, and because I do enjoy making, as I indicate when I sign off on each blog post, definitive statements about things I have marginal knowledge of.

 

A request from BT for a travel recommendation: 

“I’m a longtime admirer of your writing & worldview. I’m visiting Savannah for the first time in 2-3 weeks. Might you have any recommendations for live music venues, theater, or dining options? I’m especially interested in catching some jazz or blues.”

My Response: Savannah is one of my favorite cities to visit in the US. My interest is mostly in the city’s history and architecture. I don’t usually have time to take in live entertainment when I’m there. However, some of the venues that have been recommended to me for jazz and blues are Casimir’s Lounge, Bay Street Blues, and the Bayou Café. For theater, investigate the Savannah Theatre and the Tybee Post Theater.

Continue Reading

Surprise Reunion 

There are hundreds of YouTube videos on this theme, but this one is especially poignant/funny because of how old the granny is. Click here to watch.

Continue Reading