He: Understanding Masculine Psychology 

By Robert A. Johnson

83 pages

First published Jan. 1, 1974

It was sitting inconspicuously on the built-in bookcase behind the headboard, along with several hundred other books I brought to Villa Santana about 15 years ago, hoping to one day find the time to read them.

It looked to be about 80 pages. (More of a longish essay than a book.) The yellowed paper gave its age away. Nearly 50 years old.

I was ambivalent about the title: He: Understanding Masculine Psychology. I remembered the name of the author, Robert A. Johnson. But only vaguely. Wasn’t he one of those spiritual hippie writers that were so popular among university students in the 1980s?

On the back cover, there was a blurb summarizing the book’s thesis:

“What does it really mean to be a man? What are some of the landmarks along the road to mature masculinity? And what of the feminine components of a man’s personality? Women have developed, over the centuries, considerable expertise in the technique of adapting to men, and for good reason, but that is not the same as truly understanding them. The transition from male childhood to real manhood is a complicated struggle….”

Beneath that was a paragraph about Robert A. Johnson: A “noted lecturer and Jungian analyst in private practice in San Diego, CA”… “studied Jungian Psychology at the Jung Institute in Switzerland and at the Sri Aurobindo Ashram in India”… “also the author of She: Understanding Feminine Psychology and We: Understanding the Psychology of the Romantic Love.”

It was only 80 pages. And my relationship with the idea of masculinity has been a recurring area of interest in my life. So, I decided to give it a try.

One of my favorite sayings is, “When the student is ready, the teacher appears.” I take it to mean that there are many ideas we encounter growing up that we can’t understand until much later. I always thought it was a quote from Lao Tzu, a must-read (or pretend-to-have-read) ancient Chinese philosopher when I was in college. But I looked it up. Nope. It was not Lao Tzu.

Actually, nobody knows where the maxim came from. But whoever said it was speaking to me. I’ve had that experience of learning something important that I’d read or heard before but ignored at least a hundred times. And I’ve been told by at least a hundred people that something I said or wrote had that effect on them.

He is a book that I feel like I needed to read right about this time in my life. It is a serious book about male psychology – about how boys are made and how easy it is for them to turn out badly. But also how, if they act in accordance with their nature, they can achieve a satisfying equilibrium with nature and an equally satisfying level of wisdom as they age.

What I Liked About It 

For such a short treatise, Johnson presents a surprising number of fascinating ideas.

He provides a readable, concise, and convincing analysis of the symbolism in the legend of King Arthur and the Holy Grail. He also offers his own take on how the King Arthur/ Holy Grail mythology highlights important facts about what, at the core, it means to be a boy and a man. And he provides an intriguing introduction to the psychological insights and theories of Carl Jung.

Jung is, or was, considered one of the most important psychological philosophers of the 20th century. Equal to Freud. Yet today, he’s almost forgotten. In He, we get a succinct explanation of Jungian psychology and the Jungian conception of masculinity.

I Was Ready for This Book 

In those brief 80 pages, Johnson helped me realize that, at age 72, when I should be well into my wise and settled years, I’m still stuck at a threshold that I should have passed through many years ago. I still haven’t made the transition from the restless, striving, never-satisfied middle years of manhood to the level of maturity that will only come when I stop trying to be so much of a man.

It took me a just a few hours to read He, but it had a strong impact on my thinking about myself.

I recommend it (to both men and women) without hesitation.

Continue Reading

The August 23 Debate: Two Perspectives

I didn’t get to watch the debate, but I watched several dozen clips and a half-dozen retrospective reviews. This one from The Dispatch highlighted something that so many people on both sides of the aisle don’t want to accept:

On Trump’s Indictments, There Was No Debate 

“When the Fox News broadcast returned from commercial, co-anchor Bret Baier asked for a show of hands: Who onstage would still support Trump as the GOP nominee if he is convicted of a crime? All the candidates, save former Govs. Chris Christie and Asa Hutchinson, raised their hands.

“Most, when given the opportunity to explain themselves, went after the ‘weaponization’ of the Justice Department and ‘political’ prosecutions. None of the remaining candidates made any arguments that the charges against Trump in any of the four jurisdictions where he’s been indicted disqualify the former president, and Vivek Ramaswamy even challenged his rivals to follow his lead and commit to pardoning Trump if elected president. (Mike Pence was not amused.)

“It was a remarkable collective decision by the field not to use the frontrunner’s chief vulnerability against him. It reflects the broad conventional wisdom, which GOP strategists working for these campaigns espouse, that loyalty to Trump is itself a litmus test for primary voters.”

You can read the full review here.

And for another perspective, there’s this from Olivia Reingold in The Free Press.

I think both pieces made good points. But the elephant in the room – the fact that none of Trump’s adversaries (Republicans and Democrats) don’ t want to acknowledge – is that the indictments haven’t worked as planned. If anything, they have expanded Trump’s lead, and nobody knows what to do about that.

Continue Reading

David Foster Wallace’s Legendary Commencement Speech 

LC sent this in. “Forgive me if this 23-minute recording is repetitive,” he wrote. “Perhaps you’ve posted about it before. I find it poignant.”

David Foster Wallace was a uniquely smart and inventive writer. Some of his novels are considered to be must reading for anyone seriously interested in contemporary fiction. He eventually killed himself. And that is a topic we could talk about for hours. But he was also practical and poetic, as you can see from this relatively short commencement address.

Click here.

Continue Reading

Quick Bites: Big Cities Lose Big, New Booze Guidelines, Recycled Playground Animals, Digital Clones, and a Quiz About the Stock Market 

  1. Big Blue cities lose trillions as major firms move south. Click here.
  2. Biden’s alcohol czar warns Americans could soon be told to limit themselves to just two drinks per week. Click here.
  3. I’m not a fan of Mayor Adams. And for all I know, he had nothing to do with this. But I was happy to see that the city found a way to recycle worn-out playground animals. Click here.
  4. A Japanese company is developing digital doubles – i.e., personalized digital clones. Click here.
  5. Try your hand at this stock market quiz from Quiz Daily. I got 18 out of 20. Not great for someone who’s been involved in investment publishing for 30 years. Click here.
Continue Reading

Re John Herring’s piece in the Aug. 22 issue: 

“Thank you for the awesome letter about storage units as rental property. I love learning about investing in real estate from you.” – KF

“I agree with your friend about contractor warehousing… Recently, I’ve found myself interested in RV parks. Good locations, short stay, eco-friendly, low maintenance. From what I’ve heard so far, they do very well…” – BW

 

My Response: Yes. I’ve heard the same thing. Because of low operational costs, steady rental income, and the fact that the owner can rent out some units as a less expensive alternative to nearby hotels, they seem like a low-risk bet. And I like low-risk propositions.

Here are 10 reasons why RV parks can be a good investment:

And here’s a short video on the pros and cons.

Continue Reading

The Astounding Diversity of Ocean Life 

I’ve always been amazed by the wide range of brilliant colors that birds were blessed with. I’m equally amazed by the diversity I see in these stunning photos of ocean life. Click here.

Continue Reading

Watching TV vs. Everything Else –And a Recommended Docuseries 

I didn’t watch a ton of TV as a child. I’m sure I would have if I could have, but my parents preferred their children to spend their spare hours reading books.

When I left home, I was, in theory at least, free to binge-watch TV day and night. But I didn’t. By then, I had absorbed my parents’ disdain for the “boob tube.” And when K and I had children, we passed it on to them.

The thing is, it was a lot easier to stay away from TV when I was a kid – and even when our children were young – than it is today. And that’s because there are so many more things to watch. Hundreds more. And a fair percentage of them are GOOD.

Here’s an example…

I’m not a nature guy. I much prefer to vacation in a city than in the mountains. And I carried this prejudice into my TV viewing habits. I don’t think I ever watched a show about nature till just last week. What changed that was giving a Netflix documentary series called Our Planet a try. Within minutes of watching episode one of the first season, I was enthralled.

What makes the series so appealing to me is how amazingly well it’s produced. From the script to the informational content to the photography and the narration, it’s a constantly rewarding way to spend some of my down time.

I watched the first two episodes of Our Planet II tonight. Two in a row. That’s not something I normally do. The last time I did it was at least 10 years ago. I binge-watched 24. (Remember that series with Kiefer Sutherland?)

The episode I just finished is titled “Following the Sun.” The motif is the relationship between the rotation of the sun, which causes significant temperature changes all over the world, and the migration of animals. It’s a topic I’ve never given much thought to. And a topic I probably don’t really need to know much about.

But I watched it. And I learned some marvelous things.

Did you know that many animals – thousands of species – migrate as the seasons change? That would include most four-legged mammals, all sorts of birds, many fish, and many creatures smaller than fish. They migrate because of necessity. If they don’t get to a warmer climate in time, they die. That’s easy enough to understand. What’s surprising, though, is how they migrate.

The episode followed dozens of creatures on their long and super-challenging trips, often traveling thousands of miles populated with predators eager and able to consume them.

Some animals, like lions, don’t move. They just stay where they are and wait for the animals they feast on to migrate their way.

Some sharks travel and some don’t. When it’s time for albatross to migrate, the local sharks hang out along the coastline where the chicks mature into adults and then attack them as they try to lift themselves above the water. This life-and-death fight is amazing to watch. You can’t help but root for the albatross.

Did you know that bees migrate? They do. They migrate when there are just too many of them. A single hive can accommodate 100,000 bees. When it gets overcrowded, a small number of bees act as “scouts” to search out better living quarters, with just the right amount of sun and shade, and of a size that could accommodate a new tribe. The details of how they spread the news of what they’ve found are mesmerizing.

The migration habits of Snow Geese are equally remarkable. Snow Geese lay eggs only once a year, in the arctic summer. The females lay the eggs and keep them warm, while the males protect them from the foxes… and then the bears. Just eight weeks after hatching, the little goslings must make their first flight all the way to the warmth of the Gulf of Mexico.

The stories are fantastic. So, too, is the photography. I have no idea how they managed to get close-ups of, for example, the inside a new bees’ nest as it formed… or lions hiding in the grass as wildebeests passed by, hoping to feed themselves or die.

You can watch the trailer for Our Planet here.

And the trailer for Our Planet II here.

Continue Reading

Another Civil War? The Math Is Scary

The battle between Democrats and Republicans is heating up.

A recent study published by the University of Chicago’s Project on Security & Threats reports a steep rise in the percentage of each group that is comfortable with using violence to achieve its political objectives. According to the report, about 18 million Republicans (7% of the US population) believe that force may be necessary to “reinstate Donald Trump to the presidency.” That’s an increase of 6 million over those that held that opinion at the end of Trump’s term. Even scarier, 44 million Democrats (17% of the population) are comfortable with using violence to compel Congress to do what they consider to be “the right thing.”

That’s a total of 62 million Americans that are willing to use violence to accomplish their political objectives. A whole lot of potential warriors. (The total number of Americans that fought in the US Civil War was 3 million.)

Click here.

 

The Female Pickup Artists 

TheWizardLiz: Her YouTube video “How to receive princess treatment” has a million views 

A new group of influencers is peddling an old strategy, says Kat Rosenfield, writing in The Free Press. But with a difference. The old strategy (made famous in the 1995 bestseller The Rules) was about snaring an old-fashioned “good” man and having an old-fashioned “good” marriage. The new strategy has different goals, because it is based on a very different view of male-female relationships – one that is more transactional. Sort of like prostitution.

Click here.

 

Big Companies Losing Faith in Remote Work 

On Aug. 11, I reported that Zoom (ironically) now requires most of their employees to be in the office, in person, at least 2.5 days a week. And now Meta is threatening termination for employees who do not show up in person at least three days a week.

Click here.

Continue Reading

The Growing Problem of Homelessness in the US

The US experienced an astonishingly large increase in homelessness in 2022. It went up a record-breaking 11%, That’s the highest it’s been since 2019, when the increase was a comparatively modest 2.7%.

Some politicians and government officials are blaming it on the rising cost of housing and increase in evictions. That could be a factor, but it can’t possibly be the main cause. All the research I’ve seen indicates that somewhere between 60% and 80% of the homeless are drug-addicted and/or mentally disturbed. Moving them into shelters is at best a temporary solution because so many of them prefer to live in the streets. (And say so, when asked.)

My view: The homeless problem will never be solved until two things happen.

  1. We recognize that homelessness is not an economic problem but a mental health and addiction problem.
  2. We understand that homelessness is a very substantial, very profitable, multibillion-dollar industry, and that few people in that industry want to see the problem solved.

Click here.

Continue Reading

The Geetar Revolution

Oliver Anthony Music 

You’ve probably heard about this fellow Oliver Anthony Music and his recording of “Rich Men North of Richmond.” It shot to the top of the Billboard Hot 100 chart when it was released last week.

It’s the second such working-class anthem that has taken off this summer. In July, Jason Aldean had a huge hit with “Try That in a Small Town,” which was denounced by the left as racist and praised by the right as the new hymn of the silent minority.

Both songs share political and social sentiments – including anger at leftist ideas and a pro-American bias. But the lyrics of “Rich Men North of Richmond” are less vague and more specific. They read like a Libertarian critique against big government and woke culture.

And, as Bill Bonner points out in a recent essay, the song has a nuance that “Try That in a Small Town” lacks:

“The ‘rich men north of Richmond’ idea is clean and simple. It avoids all the political claptrap and distracting culture wars. Democrats vs. Republicans… LGBTQ rights… racism… inequality… blah, blah, blah.

“In the things that really matter – money and war – the elites of both parties are unified, as tight as a head gasket. Presidents change… but the laws, regulations, bureaucracy, the Deep State, the wars and deficits don’t.

“Why? Because they suit the rich men north of Richmond…”

  Read the entire essay here.

Continue Reading