Hunter Biden’s Missing Laptop: It Wasn’t a Hoax

After three years of the New York Post and Fox News reporting on it, and the NYT and CNN (et al.) debunking it, the truth is out. On Mar. 17, the Times quietly acknowledged that it has been wrong. The story of Hunter Biden’s laptop – with all its incriminating evidence – was not a “conspiracy theory.”

The contents of the laptop show that, during the time his father was vice president, Hunter and his uncle James were receiving millions of dollars from foreign countries. For example:

* The Chinese conglomerate CEFC China Energy paid Hunter $6 million for “consulting” and “legal” fees, and another $1 million for finding a US lawyer to defend Patrick Ho, a Chinese spy.

* The Bidens also received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the widow of Russian oligarch Yury Luzhkov, the former mayor of Moscow.

Other deals were done in Qatar, Russia, and Ukraine.

The story originally broke on Oct. 14, 2020, when the Post ran a front-page story, detailing how emails from the laptop tied Hunter and his father to Ukrainian business partners.

It was dismissed as fake news by the mainstream media, social media, and even some US intelligence officials. You may remember the big ad placed in the NYT by 50 former intelligence officials, including former CIA Director John Brennan and James Clapper, calling the laptop story “Russian disinformation.” You may also remember that Twitter deplatformed the Post for two weeks.

Throughout the 2020 campaign, Joe Biden repeatedly denied any knowledge of or connection to Hunter’s overseas business. During the second presidential debate, he claimed that stories about his son’s laptop were “a Russian plant.”

After the NYT admitted that there was indeed a real story here, The Washington Post followed suit. And since then, facts have been gradually coming to light.

Click here.