After the Storm

Late Wednesday afternoon, one of the Mules asked me if we were still planning to have our book club meeting at the cigar club, as planned. I replied, “Why wouldn’t we?”

He said, “Because of the storm.”

I said, “Oh, that. When is that supposed to hit?”

He said, “Tonight.”

I said, “Well, the cigar club is basically a cement bunker filled with booze. I’m going. So is Frank, the bartender. And Olio, the restaurant down the street, is delivering the food.”

He said, “I’ll be there.”

It was raining when the meeting began at six. And it was raining when it ended at ten. There were apparently gusts of wind here and there, but we never noticed them. When I went to bed, it had stopped raining. I woke around two in the morning and looked outside onto the beach. It was beautiful and calm.

Thursday morning, it was bright and sunny.

This is what happens 9 out of 10 times that we are alerted to an impending hurricane. That’s why it’s difficult for long-term Floridians to put much stock in weather reports, especially urgent ones. And that’s why we get a kick out of coverage like this:

Continue Reading

What Are My Thoughts? 

JS, my editor, thought I should write something about the election results. So, I’ve been thinking about what I think and, so far, I don’t have any thoughts worth writing about. But I do have a feeling about the results. On both a state and a federal level, I feel a bit safer about the future than I felt a week ago. With more of a balance in the House (and maybe the Senate), there should be a slightly better chance that Congress will do an overall better job by passing fewer laws and spending less money and generally reducing their power and presence. Okay. Maybe that’s optimistic. Still, as Hem said, isn’t it pretty to think so?

Continue Reading

Is Google Influencing Elections? 

Speaking of elections, I ran across this earlier this week: the assertion that Google has been using its algorithms to influence elections. It seems like a “conspiracy theory,” but the source checks out. And I wasn’t able to find anything to refute it. Could it be true? And if true, isn’t this a huge story?

Click here to judge for yourself.

Continue Reading

Would You Ask This Question? If Asked, Could You Answer It? 

If I were in charge, nobody would be allowed to become an employee until he/she had spent some time running a business. And nobody would be allowed to run a business until he/she had spent some time as an employee.

Also, nobody would be allowed to voice an opinion about socialism unless they had lived in a socialist economy. And nobody would be allowed to say anything about capitalism unless they had lived in a capitalist country.

I know. That is illogical. Still, it’s how things should be.

I’m saying this in response to the video below. Here, you have a bright kid from a good university asking Milton Friedman what he believes is a “gotcha” question, only to learn how dumb a question it is.

It is evident that the hosts are not aware of these simple business measurement tactics. Don Lemon’s comment about Flay’s observation that we are in a bad economy (“They say we are…”) is almost mind numbing in its dumbness.

Continue Reading

What I Believe: About Gun Control

I think everyone should have the right to own a gun. Or guns. But I also believe in gun control. I can’t, for the life of me, understand the arguments against, at the very least, banning assault weapons.

The best argument in favor of assault weapons is a political and theoretical one. It’s based on the second amendment, which states that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” But the primary rationale for the second amendment was not for protection against robbery or personal assault. It was for protection against tyranny. Our founding fathers had risked their lives defending America from tyranny, in large part with state militias. They recognized that the government they were establishing could one day devolve into tyranny. To prevent that, they wanted citizens to be armed.

So, if that was the intention, and we want to hold fast to the intention, it’s difficult to argue with the right for all Americans not just to be armed, but to be armed to the hilt so they could militia-up and fight governmental tyranny.

But as a pragmatist, I can’t see that playing out in the real world.

Tyranny is a real threat. And we should be on guard against it. I just don’t think the answer is a deluge of automatic weapons.

That’s where my thinking is now. And I would be wasting your reading time if that was all I had to say on the subject. But, in researching assault weapons, I discovered something interesting. It’s something you may not know.

I assumed that assault weapons were responsible for most of the homicides in America. It turns out, that’s not true.

According to FBI data, handguns are the weapons of choice for most killers in this country. In every one of the past 20 years, the overwhelming majority of murders involved handguns. And an NIH study confirmed that, depending on the year, assault rifles accounted for between 2% and 12% of all homicides.

In the chart below, you can see that, in this particular year, automatic handguns and rifles were used in 329 murders, or about 2% of the total.

Conclusion: This is not to say that assault weapons are not a problem. When it comes to mass shootings, they are, indeed, the weapon of choice. Assault weapons are involved in more than 80% of mass killings, according to FBI data. (Interesting: The greatest mass killer in American history must certainly be Charles Cullen – i.e., The Good Nurse. And he didn’t use a weapon of any kind.) Given my thoughts on applying the death penalty to serial killers and mass murderers (see what I said about capital punishment in Tuesday’s issue), logic compels me to favor significant restrictions, including serious psychological screening, for owning assault weapons.

Continue Reading

“There is a lot of talk now about metal detectors and gun control. Both are good things. But they are no more a solution than forks and spoons are a solution to world hunger.” – Anna Quindlen

Continue Reading

Is This a Party You’d Want to Go To? 

Click here for a first-person account of the recent LACMA fundraiser, which raised $5 million. It will tell you everything that is wrong about the art market today.

Continue Reading

Warning: This is very nerdy. Literary nerdy.

It’s called the Literature Clock, and it works like this. Rather than glancing at your watch or phone, go to this website – https://literature-clock.jenevoldsen.com – and you’ll get the time expressed in a quote (usually from some obscure book and author). For example, I’m writing this at 3:59 p.m., and this is the quote that just came up:

“He looked at his watch: it was nearly 4. He helped Delphine to her feet and led her down a passage to a rear door that gave on to the hospital garden.” – The Blue Afternoon, by William Boyd

Continue Reading

Re what I’ve been saying about violence in big cities – the NYC subways, in particular: 

“Your Nov. 4 issue[LINK] about passion, weddings, and kale was a pleasant read until the negative New York trope. I realize that fear, real or imagined, cannot be changed by a few words. But I feel compelled to point out that over 900 million people have taken the subway so far this year. Compare that to the 25 pushing incidents and the odds of it happening to you are minuscule. In fact, yesterday’s paper had an article that pointed out, ‘Put into perspective, the current rate of 1.2 violent crimes for every one million rides is roughly equal to the chance of getting injured in a crash if one drives a car two miles.’ Add to that the health benefits of walking up and down the stairs, the environmental impact of the cab, and the $1.35 senior rate and you might want to join K’s line of thinking.” – KK

My Response: Thanks for doing the research to defend the hell hole (or is it shit hole?) you are living in. I’m going to spend the next 24 hours trying to find a fault with your logic. If I can’t (and I have to admit, it doesn’t look promising), I’ll publicly admit you are right. (I still won’t admit I’m wrong. You know the Zen idea: Two contrasting truths can exist at the same time.)

Continue Reading