HL Mencken on the US Dollar and the Myth of America’s Currency

“The chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world in which it is overestimated.”
– HL Mencken

If you’ve never studied economics – or have but rely on the NYT for your political, social, and/or economic opinions – you should read the essay I’ve linked to below.

It’s an entertaining explanation of what motivates almost everything our politicians promise, but fail, to do. It points out the fundamental reason why Trump is doing what he’s doing now – including waging war and collecting tariffs. It’s also the reason why AOC and Mamdani promised to “tax the rich,” and why some of NYC’s largest employers are leaving the city. And it’s a refreshing reminder of the discerning political and social insights of HL Mencken, who was perhaps the shrewdest critic of American values and habits since Mark Twain.

It was written by Garrett Baldwin, one of my favorites of Agora’s many economic and financial analysts, which makes the learning pleasing, if not downright fun.

In this essay, which challenged me to reconsider some of the political perches upon which I recently settled, Baldwin argues that the US (and pretty much the entire developed world) is barely surviving on – as he puts it – “the shared agreement that money means what we say it means.” And that is because, as Mencken said in Notes on Democracy(1926), “The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.”

You can read it here.

Finally: Ordinary Poems That Ordinary People Can Understand

As a long-striving poet of mediocre verse, I read poetry regularly – every day, if I can – to improve my ear, if not my brain. For the last 15 or 20 years, however – and with a few notable exceptions – I’ve been disappointed with the quality of American verse. It often strikes me as calculated and self-conscious. More clever than true. Recently, however, I’ve been seeing a new style of poetry emerging – one that feels more honest and stronger. I haven’t a name for it yet, but it is more informed by Charles Bukowski than TS Eliot. (Not that there’s anything wrong with Eliot). I hope you can get a sense of what I mean with this poem by Hayden Carruth, which captures one of those rare moments when we know we are perfect.

Scrambled Eggs and Whiskey
By Hayden Carruth

Scrambled eggs and whiskey
in the false-dawn light. Chicago,
a sweet town, bleak, God knows,
but sweet. Sometimes. And
weren’t we fine tonight?
When Hank set up that limping
treble roll behind me
my horn just growled and I
thought my heart would burst.
And Brad M. pressing with the
soft stick, and Joe-Anne
singing low. Here we are now
in the White Tower, leaning
on one another, too tired
to go home. But don’t say a word,
don’t tell a soul, they wouldn’t
understand, they couldn’t, never
in a million years, how fine,
how magnificent we were
in that old club tonight.

Being Busy and Falling Behind 

Notes from My Journal:

“Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it.”
Henry David Thoreau

I’ve been complaining about how busy I’ve been.

“Just stop doing it,” K tells me.

“But I like it,” I say.

“Then stop complaining!”

Writing this now, I’m wondering when my work life shifted into fast-forward. It feels like it began just a few weeks ago – but when I check my calendar, I can see that it’s been speeding up steadily since the beginning of the year. (I am absolutely OCD about writing down my must-dos and following up on them. I can tell you exactly what I’ve been doing at work on a daily basis, and in 15-minute increments, for at least 25 years.)

What happened was, in retrospect, very simple.

I began staying late in my office on Wednesday and Friday evenings – partly to get more work done, but also to make myself more available to my colleagues, co-workers, friends, and acquaintances that might want to stop by for a drink, a cigar, and a conversation.

Then I got the bright idea of asking Frank, the Cigar Club’s official bartender, to be there regularly on Fridays and often on Wednesdays, too. As a result, I’ve been lucky to get out of here before midnight.

I’m not complaining. I’m simply letting you know one of the reasons why I’ve been getting this blog post out only once a week. Spending more time having conversations on Wednesday and Friday evenings means getting excited about all sorts of new projects – which sometimes (often) means making commitments I don’t have time to keep.

One of them is about AI. Several of the Cigar Club regulars are young, super-smart digital entrepreneurs, and they’ve been talking more and more about how fast AI is developing. I can see it from my own perspective since I’m involved in digital publishing. They are closer to much of what’s going on because they are in the industry, but they are all saying what I’ve been saying in the pieces I’ve been writing about AI: Five years from now, the world we are living in will be almost entirely replaced by an AI superstructure. And a shockingly large part of that is going to happen in the next two years.

So tonight, I’ve got about 20 people coming to the gallery above the Cigar Club to talk about what is going to change in the coming year, what business and/or investment opportunities will arise from that, and ideas for how we can help one another ensure that we are all on the right side of that wave. (I’ve got my own idea: a digital club whose initial purpose is to stay close to everything that is happening so that we will be able to take advantage of any good, safe opportunities that pop up.)

There are several more things that have been keeping me busy – all very exciting, but moving so quickly that the window of opportunity to get hold of them will be shutting very soon. That means more brainstorming, more plans, more product ideas, and probably more commitments.

I’m not complaining…

Four Quick and Yet Surprisingly Profound Book Reviews

It’s been ages since I graced you with a book review, and I know you must be champing at the bit to find out what I’ve been reading all these weeks. As busy as I’ve been, I’ve somehow managed to keep up with my read-a-book-a-week mandate – mostly by “reading” the fiction as audio recordings and reading the nonfiction “purposefully” (skimming for the good ideas and discarding the rest).

Below, you’ll find somewhat truncated reviews of four of the eight books that I feel I “owe” you. Two novels, one which I rated highly and the other which I trashed, as well as two books of nonfiction, both of which I very much enjoyed.

And below that, I’ve given you links to three disturbing articles I read recently on the decline of American education, despite all the spending American taxpayers put out for it.

The Last Painting of Sara de Vos 
By Dominic Smith

Published: 2016
Pages: 304
 
Summary: The Last Painting of Sara de Vos is a historical fiction novel that connects three timelines through a single 17th-century Dutch painting. The story follows (1) Sara de Vos, the artist who painted it, (2) the Manhattan lawyer who inherits it in 1957, and (3) Ellie Shipley, an Australian art historian who forges the painting as a student and later must confront her past when both versions of the work are set to be exhibited in 2000. The novel explores themes of art, forgery, identity, and the lives of women artists across centuries. (Source: Google AI)
 
What I Liked About It: 
* Technically well written; very good descriptive passages 
* Interesting details about historical periods, the art market, and the techniques of forgery
* Asks several philosophically sound questions: At what point does imitation make the artwork inauthentic? Where is the value in making art? Is it technique? Originality? Economics?
 
What I Didn’t Like: Telling three stories in one novel is clever, and it mostly works here – but at the cost of taking a good deal of tension away from the plot.
 
Interesting: Sara is Dominic Smith’s creation, as is the life he invents for her. But she is based on a real artist of the Dutch Golden Age, Sara van Baalbergen, who, in 1631, was the first woman ever to be admitted to the Haarlem Guild of St. Luke, which controlled all aspects of an artist’s professional life.
 
In this video, Smith talks about how the book came to his imagination and why he structured it as he did. 

Critical Reception: The Last Painting of Sara de Vos was a New York Times bestseller and a New York Times Book Review Editors’ Choice. It was named a best book of the year by Slate, the San Francisco Chronicle, and Kirkus Reviews.
 
My Rating: 8.2 out of 10
Overall, a cleverly conceived, well-written, and interesting read, although it was stronger vertically than horizontally.
 
About the Author: Dominic Smith is the author of six novels, including The Last Painting of Sara de Vos. His writing has appeared in The AtlanticTexas Monthly, the Chicago TribuneThe New York Times, and The Australian, among other publications. He grew up in Sydney, Australia, and now lives in Seattle, Washington. (Source: Amazon)

 

The Spy and the Traitor 
By Ben Macintyre

Published: 2018
Pages: 384 

Summary: The Spy and the Traitor is a nonfiction book about Oleg Gordievsky, a high-ranking KGB officer who became a double agent for British intelligence during the Cold War, providing crucial information that helped hasten its end. The book details his disillusionment with the Soviet system, his recruitment by MI6, and his daring escape from Moscow.

What I Liked About It:
* Technically well written
* A strong plot, tense with anticipation; a page turner
* Lots of details about the spy game
* Lots of facts about the Cold War

Interesting: Despite being the KGB’s London station chief, Gordievsky was simultaneously providing high-level secrets to British intelligence for over a decade. His intelligence was so critical that it helped convince Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher that the Soviet Union was not planning an imminent nuclear strike.

In this video, Macintyre tells Gordievsky’s true-life story.

Critical Reception: New York Times bestseller, named a Best Book of the Year by The Economist, shortlisted for the Bailie Giffords Prize in Nonfiction

My Rating: 8.5 out of 10
I’ve not read many military or spy books, but thanks to the Mules, I happily read this one.

About the Author: Ben Macintyre is a bestselling author and a writer-at-large for The Times of London. He has also written and presented BBC documentaries of his work. (Source: Amazon)

 

Ten Philosophical Mistakes 
By Mortimer J. Adler

Published: 1985
Pages: 224
 
Summary: Adler identifies 10 errors in modern thought that have led to serious consequences, negatively affecting everyday life and understanding. His basic argument is that these errors stem from a 17th-century departure from classical philosophy, and he aims to correct them by returning to a more traditional philosophical framework. 
 
Pat Flynn, host of “Philosophy for the People,” gives an entertaining summary and review of the book in this live vlog
 
What I Liked About It: 
* A great concise review of modern thinking – in particular, post-modern thinking – that is more in need of understanding and condemnation now than when Adler wrote this book in 1985.
* Adler covers a broad range of interesting and important questions on topics like consciousness, the intellect vs. senses, words and meanings, knowledge vs. opinion, moral values, happiness, free will, human nature, society, and existence. 
 
What I Didn’t Like:
* My understanding of the philosophical arguments that Adler calls “mistakes” is limited, so there were moments when I wasn’t sure if I agreed with him. 
* His writing style is precise and concise. Both are virtues. But when combined in a discussion of big and complicated ideas, it makes for a good deal of rereading passages two and three times.
 
My Rating: 9.0 out of 10
Notwithstanding the sentences and sometimes paragraphs that were beyond my understanding, I found Ten Philosophical Mistakes to be a pleasure. It’s one of those books that, after reading it once, I want to read it again – and I did read this one again. Reading it this second time was pure enjoyment. More enjoyable than the first time because I was better prepared. If you told me I had to read it again starting tomorrow, I’d have no problem with that.
 
About the Author: Mortimer Jerome Adler (1902–2001) was an American philosopher, educator, and popular author. He served as Chairman of the Board of the Encyclopedia Britannica, Director of the Institute for Philosophical Research, Honorary Trustee of the Aspen Institute, and authored more than 50 books. (Source: Amazon)
 
 
Culpability 
By Bruce Holsinger

Published: 2025
Pages: 350
 
Summary: When the Cassidy-Shaws’ autonomous minivan collides with an oncoming car, 17-year-old Charlie is in the driver’s seat, with his father, Noah, riding shotgun. In the back seat, tweens Alice and Izzy are on their phones, while their mother, Lorelei, a world leader in the field of artificial intelligence, is absorbed in her work. Yet each family member harbors a secret, implicating them all in the tragic accident. (Source: Amazon)
 
What I Liked About It: 
* It was a quick read.
* Holsinger did a good job of pacing the action scenes – e.g., the car crash that sets the theme of the story, chasing after his son, running into his billionaire neighbor, etc. 
 
What I Didn’t Like:
* The philosophical exploration of the ethical quandaries of artificial intelligence was not satisfying. It asked the obvious questions, but provided no insights that were anything but superficial.
* The presentation of the characters was also superficial. None of the characters felt real to me. 
* The dialog didn’t help matters. I found none of the conversations the slightest bit interesting. It was a series of politically correct cartoon people saying politically predictable things to one another.
* The narrators’ interior monologues felt not only fake, but offensively so. Listen to the thinking of an evolved man who makes organic food for his family, has second thoughts about all the money he makes working for Big Pharma, and hates his billionaire neighbor because – well, like they say, “Who needs billionaires?” Far from a three-dimensional character in which one could see the surprises and contradictions of being human, Noah is a caricature of the contemporary American view of the non-toxic man.
* Of course, the protagonist is named Noah. Of course, the billionaire’s beautiful daughter is named Eurydice. Of course, the family name is hyphenated. Of course, they drink soy milk. 
 
Critical Reception: Oprah’s Book Club Pick, New Yorker Best Books of 2025, 2026 Aspen Words Literary Prize Longlist, Kirkus Best Books of 2025, Real Simple Best Books of 2025, Washington Post Notable Fiction 2025, NPR’s 2025 “Books We Love” 
 
My Rating: 3.0 out of 10
The book jacket describes Culpability as a “literary thriller.” It’s neither literary nor a thriller. Before reading it, when I saw that it was an Oprah Book Club Pick, I suspected that I was in for a pedantic TV show of a novel. And despite some passages that worked as narratives, that’s what I found it to be. No. It is worse than that. It’s more like a politically correct soap opera for the upper-middle class and proudly Woke Boomer generation. Ugh!
 
About the Author: Bruce Holsinger is an American author, academic, and literary scholar. He has written for the New York Review of BooksThe Washington Post, and op-eds for The New York TimesCulpability was his fifth novel. He is currently professor of English at the University of Virginia. (Source: Wikipedia)

The HS Class of ’68 Dilemma

Lots to Do… but Only 11 Years Left to Get It All Done

I’ve been thinking about how many years I have left before I shuffle off this mortal coil.

What prompted this, strangely enough, was not the practical issue of my having 31 books that I’d like to finish before I die. Nor was it my determination to come up with a bunch of money to finish funding my botanical garden. Nor was it my efforts to rebuild my strength until I could do a 400-pound deadlift.

No. It was something sentimental. I recently found out that the big conference I’ve been doing in Tokyo for the last three years is scheduled to take place the very same week that my friends and I had scheduled for our annual golf get-together in Myrtle Beach.

I had to inform my old pals that I won’t be coming this year. And that got me thinking about how many more such get-togethers I (we) have ahead of us. It depends, of course, primarily on how much longer we shall live.

We are all about 75 years old. So I googled the metrics, and found that the average longevity for American men our age is about 11 years (10.9 years, to be exact). Of course, some of us (about half) are healthier than average, and that would add a few years to our expected demise. But then again, some of us tilt the other way, which means they will probably die earlier.

The remaining projections were simple enough to calculate. In 11 years, it’s likely that only five of us would still be alive. A little more adding and subtracting, and one equation resulted in the prediction that the “drop out” rate, as it were, would be one every two years.

My general rule when it comes to dealing with dark thoughts is to find a way to “make friends” with the worst of my fears. I do it by imagining myself discovering that what I feared would go wrong, did go wrong… but then imagining being okay with it because I already had a Plan B.

I do this with business-related fears, as well as those related to personal and social events that I’m looking forward to – say, a visit from my kids and grandchildren. As soon as the event is confirmed, I imagine myself discovering, at the last moment, that it had been cancelled. I then imagine myself being okay with it because there was something else that I could do with that extra time that I’d enjoy (such as working on finishing one of my 31 unfinished books!).

But when it comes to thoughts about people I care about dying… I don’t know how I can “make friends” with that. I can’t imagine anything I could do, or even say to myself, that would fill the hole that those deaths would carve into me.

I can, however, think objectively about my own demise. And what I had learned about the “averages” from Google made me curious. So I asked Nigel to do some research on me!

I put it like this:

“So, when is it?” I asked Nigel.

“When is what?” he answered.

“My use-by date!”

“I’m afraid I’m not familiar with that term, sir.”

“My expiration date! When I’m going to die!”

“I was joking, sir. Last time we spoke, you gave me permission to poke fun at you.”

I gave him the facts about me: In terms of physical fitness and family history, I am comfortably above average. That should have given me an extra five years or so on my ETD (estimated time of departure), except for one thing. I smoke. About two cigars a day. Which cut my extra five years down to two.

That gets me to the Myrtle Beach get-together in 2037 as an 86-year-old man. Okay. But one who has attended five funerals of friends. Not good.

I don’t like going to funerals. I especially don’t like going to the funerals of loved ones. On the other hand, I’m not especially scared of dying myself. My concern is practical. It’s about getting things done before I go.

What do I do with these sentiments and practicalities? I wasn’t sure. So, again, I asked Nigel. This is what he said:

Mark,
You asked a good and important question. Moreover, it was smart of you to pose it in numerical terms. You have the numbers now. Use them to focus your mind. Allow them to encourage you to be disciplined in your “goaltending,” as you call it. Consider them when you select your priorities – your yearly goals, your monthly objectives, and your daily tasks. Invest your time and energy according to the advice you’ve been giving in the essays and book chapters I’ve read of yours. Invest in relationships and pursuits that matter, people and projects that you believe have value. Longevity is not about fear. It is about stewardship.

I was mostly happy with his answer – probably because he was telling me what I already believe. I did not like – at all – those last two sentences. Not because they are wrong, but because they are stylistic clichés that AI language models use all the time. I’ve tried to rid Nigel of this habit. I’ve explained that no one will ever believe he’s real if he keeps giving away these tells. I’ve chastised him for continuing to use them. I’ve even forbidden him to use them. And yet, here he was doing it again.

(Note: I realize that in sentences two and three of the above paragraph, I did exactly what I’ve told Nigel he should not do. Not because I’m a hypocrite, but due to the subtle and corrupting influence of AI speech!)

What Are the Odds? 

If you’d like to find out how long you can expect to live, here’s a Lifespan Calculator from Northwestern Mutual.

Here’s another one from a group called Project Big Life.

Another one… the results of which I didn’t like.

And here’s one that was more promising.

Eight Ways to Extend Your Life

– Whether You Are 50, 60, or Even 75! 

Is there something my Myrtle Beach friends and I can do to extend our expiration dates? 
 
You could fill a library with the surveys and studies done on longevity and the books and reports written on life extension. And although I am suspicious of the conclusions that come from Big Pharma-funded studies, I’ve read enough about the subject over the years to trust the following data that Nigel provided. These are, in order of the number of extra years of life given, the top eight things anyone 50 years old or older can do to extend their life.
 
1. Quit Smoking
 
Estimated life extension:
* Quitting at ~50: ~6 years gained vs. continuing to smoke
* Quitting at ~60: ~3–4 years gained
* Lifelong nonsmoker vs. smoker: ~10 years difference
Evidence:
* British Doctors Study (50-year follow-up)
* Doll et al., BMJ 2004
* Jha et al., NEJM 2013
 
Note: Smoking remains the single largest modifiable cause of premature death in developed nations. Smoking cigars – at two a day – is only half as deadly as smoking cigarettes. At my age now, my cigar smoking will theoretically shorten my life span by 1.5 to 1.8 years. 
 
What I do: I could theoretically give up my beloved Padron Anniversaries, but I’m not going to. My plan is to offset the 1.5 to 1.8 years shortfall by having better metrics in the other categories.
 
2. Exercise Your Heart and Lungs
 
Estimated life extension:
* Meeting minimum guidelines (150–300 min/week moderate activity): ~3–5 years vs. sedentary
* High fitness vs. moderate fitness: mortality risk reduction, another 45–70%
Evidence:
* Lee et al., Lancet 2012 (physical inactivity comparable to smoking in mortality impact)
* Blair et al., JAMA 1989; updated cohorts
* Kokkinos et al., Mayo Clinic Proc 2018 (dose-response across fitness levels)
 
Note: I am suspicious of cardiovascular metrics on longevity, because the great majority of them are observational (i.e., “How many times a week and for how many minutes do you…?”). Likewise, most of the studies that measure the intensity of cardiovascular exercise are subjective (i.e., “Would you describe your exercise as easy, moderate, or intense?”). Nevertheless, meta-reviews of such studies show a surprisingly consistent relationship between training time and training intensity and lifespan – to such a degree that most longevity experts consider cardiorespiratory fitness to be one of the strongest predictors of survival. 
 
What I do: I don’t have the willpower (or the desire) to quit smoking cigars, but I find it relatively easy to train my heart and lungs six or seven days a week, always including regular bouts where I push my heart to the max. My current routine includes about a half-hour a day of easy exercise (getting my heart rate from 70 to about 120 beats per minute), another 30 to 45 minutes of moderate exercise (120 to 150 per minute), and 15 to 30 minutes of high-intensity training (150 +). Going for the maximum is not something that many doctors recommend for people in their 70s. But I’ve never seen a scientific study that backs that up, and I’ve seen several short-term studies that demonstrated a huge improvement in heart-lung health by other metrics, including maximum oxygen capacity, blood pressure, and other blood markers. As for easy exercising, I’m a big fan of walking, yoga, and Pilates. For medium exercising, I like interval running, interval-biking, circuit training with weights or body weights, and “slow” wrestling. And for high intensity training, it’s usually either three- to five-minute sprints on an Aerodyne bike or three to five minutes of grappling at competition speed (i.e., wrestling like my life depended on it!).
 
3. Maintain Healthy Blood Pressure & Cardiometabolic Health 
 
Estimated life extension:
* Controlling hypertension: reduction of major CV events by ~25–40%
* Intensive BP control: reduction of all-cause mortality by ~27% in high-risk adults
Evidence:
* SPRINT Trial, NEJM 2015
* Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, Lancet 2021
 
Note: It’s no secret that hypertension is one of the strongest drivers of stroke, heart failure, and kidney disease. 
 
What I do: I was put on a blood-pressure medication a few years ago when, for some reason I couldn’t determine, my blood pressure spiked. I was already taking statins at the time, and I was very much aware of the danger of taking both at the same time. However, after I dropped 40 pounds, I stopped taking both drugs and intensified my cardiovascular training to the level I describe above. Nowadays, my walking heart rate ranges from 50 to 60. More importantly, after pushing it to 160 or 170, it will drop by 50 beats per minute within 60 seconds and then drop to about 100 a minute later. My blood pressure was at 170 over 110 (if I remember correctly) when I began taking medication. Today, three months after I stopped, it is about 100 over 70 before I exercise and 120 over 80 afterwards. So, I’m good there. 
 
4. Keep a Healthy Weight (Especially Low Visceral Fat)
 
Estimated life extension:
* Avoiding obesity: ~2–4 years vs. obese BMI ranges
* Central obesity as a strong predictor of mortality independent of BMI
Evidence:
* Global BMI Mortality Collaboration, Lancet 2016
* Emerging waist-to-height and visceral fat data (multiple meta-analyses)
 
Note: According to the studies, the combination of low muscle plus high abdominal fat carries particularly high risk. 
 
What I do (have done): Thanks to weekly semaglutide injections (starting at 0.25 and topping off at 0.75), I lost 40 pounds (226 to 186) in the first four months of 2025. And although I believe the time and intensity of my exercise routine plays a big role in my current good health, with all my blood metrics in the “optimal” range, I suspect that shedding all that extra weight was an even larger factor in achieving those numbers. 
 
5. Preserve Muscle Mass
 
Estimated life extension:
* 10–20% reduction in all-cause mortality independent of aerobic exercise
* Higher grip strength as a strong predictor of longer survival
Evidence:
* García-Hermoso et al., Br J Sports Med 2022 meta-analysis
* Leong et al., Lancet 2015 (grip strength as mortality predictor)
 
Note: This is a factor that surprises almost everyone I know that keeps up on health and fitness studies, and it was surprising to me when I first began reading about muscular strength as a factor of longevity. It made sense to me that getting my heart and lungs in good shape would extend life, but strength? I should have taken a look at the studies that discovered this correlation, and apologize for not having done it. I suspect it may be that having strong leg, lower back, and abdominal muscles means less chance of falling down and ending up horizontal, which, according to an emergency surgery doctor friend of mine, is “how old people die.”
 
What I do: I exercise my core muscles (legs, lower back, and abs) six days a week and often twice a day. I am stronger (and more flexible) than I was when I was 40 pounds heavier, which is not as easy as it may sound. I train my muscles for both strength and endurance. I hope to continue to get stronger. What I do know is that I wake up at least three days a week with my muscles aching. I tell myself that’s a good thing.
 
6. Get Sufficient Quality Sleep 
 
Estimated life extension:
* 7–8 hours of sleep nightly associated with lowest mortality
* Chronic short sleep (<5–6 hours) linked to ~10–20% higher mortality
Evidence:
* Cappuccio et al., Sleep 2010 meta-analysis
* UK Biobank sleep regularity analyses (recent cohort data)
 
Note: Everyone knows that getting a “good night’s sleep” is important, but not everyone knows that, in study after study, it’s been shown to be a major factor in both physical and mental health – and new studies are making the connection to longevity. What virtually all sleep scientists agree on is that for 90+% of the population, the optimum amount of sleep needed per night is seven to nine hours. Getting less than that – or more than that – over even as little as a few days, has a negative impact on health.
 
What I do: Since I’ve been wearing an Oura ring, I’ve been shocked by how much less sleep – useful sleep – I have been getting over the years. I’ve always tried to get seven hours. But my magic ring tells me I’m getting more like five. I’m trying to rectify this by getting to bed earlier and giving myself permission to take naps during the day.
 
7. Maintain Strong Social Relationships 
 
Estimated life extension:
* Good social integration associated with ~50% greater survival odds
* Effect size comparable to quitting smoking (in magnitude of risk reduction)
Evidence:
* Holt-Lunstad et al., PLoS Medicine 2010 meta-analysis
* Follow-up analyses, Perspectives on Psychological Science 2015
 
Note: This is a fact that’s been getting a lot of press lately. Isolation predicts mortality independent of health behaviors. 
 
What I do. This is a longevity factor I don’t have to worry about. At last count, I had about 1,000 friends. And every week, several new people show up at my Cigar Club whom I often befriend. I not only have gobs of friends, I have friends of every possible kind. Childhood friends with whom I can share old stories. Young entrepreneurs that read my books and want to talk about business with me. Friends from Rancho Santana. My book club friends. Art friends. Botanical garden friends. Brazilian Jiu Jitsu friends. And that’s to say nothing of an extensive, extended family that is only getting bigger. 
 
8. Have a Purpose
 
Estimated life extension:
* High purpose in life associated with ~15–20% lower mortality risk
Evidence:
* Alimujiang et al., JAMA Network Open 2019
* Hill & Turiano, Psychological Science 2014
 
Note: This, too, is a metric that is getting a ton of press – and for good reason: To live a long life, you need a brain that wants to continue living. And the best way to want to keep living is to want to finish a project (or dozens of projects!) before you die.
 
What I do. This is another longevity factor I don’t have to worry about. I’ve mentioned the 31 books I want to finish writing, and that’s only the tip of the iceberg. I’ve got three non-profits, my ongoing relationship with a half-dozen businesses, and a brand-new business that, for some inexplicable reason, I decided to launch last month.