“The Greatest Film Ever Made”? 

About 30 years ago, I severed an Achilles tendon playing basketball. Post-surgery, I had to spend more than three weeks off my feet. I was very active athletically at the time, so the thought of being supine for 20 to 30 days was unthinkable. To feel better, I vowed to spend a good portion of that downtime doing new and useful things. One of them was to watch at least two dozen of the best movies ever made.

My primary resource was the American Film Institute. But I also looked at a half-dozen other “best movies” lists. In doing that research, one film was consistently at the top: Citizen Kane.

I watched it then and thought it was “good” in many ways, but not “great.” There were too many oddities about the film that left me feeling puzzled.

I watched it again about 10 years ago, and my opinion of it improved, from “good” to “quite good.”

And then I watched it earlier this week, and upgraded my rating once again.

Continue Reading

Citizen Kane 

Release date: 1941

Directed by Orson Welles

Starring Orson Welles, Joseph Cotten, Dorothy Comingore, and Agnes Moorehead

Available on several streaming services, including Netflix and Amazon Prime

Citizen Kane is revered by many critics. And yet, it was not a big hit with the public. Even from a P&L perspective, it was a flop.

Still, if any movie deserves to be considered an auteur film, it’s Citizen Kane. Orson Welles not only starred in it, but produced it, directed it, cast it, and co-wrote the screenplay.

The movie was heralded as revolutionary in many ways, including the cinematography, the lighting, and the staging. But many of the innovations were, according to Welles, a product of his ignorance. Being new to the movie business, he had no idea of what “could not be done.” And thanks to his stature as an actor, instead of telling him that certain things couldn’t be done, his crew went ahead and figured out how to do them.

Other lauded “innovations” – in terms of mood and music – were simply homages to the techniques of little-known European directors, in particular, the German expressionists that Welles admired.

What I Liked About Citizen Kane 

* The ambition of the story: The tragic portrayal of a larger-than-life man, and a depiction of America during a key era of its history.

* The ambition of its genre: It attempts to be a classic tragedy, and mostly succeeds.

* Its thematic dimensions: It explores both the culture of the times and the psychology of the man.

* The set design: Theatrically impressive. Even breathtaking at times.

* The photography: Disturbing at times, unsettling often, but always engaging.

* The acting – especially Welles’s charismatic interpretation of Kane.

What I Didn’t Like So Much 

* The flashback structure didn’t quite work for me. Flashbacks are commonplace now. And when done well, they enhance the plot. But in Citizen Kane, they seemed, at times, artificial.

* From a horizontal perspective, Citizen Kane is very good. It gave me a good sense of so many elements of US society back then. From a vertical perspective, however, it was unsatisfying. It gave me only a superficial sense of who this character really was, what motivated him, etc.

Interesting 

* Orson Welles got credit for writing the screenplay, but he had employed a script writer, Herman J. Mankiewicz, to shape his voluminous notes. The screenplay won an Academy Award that was shared by both men, but not before Mankiewicz had to threaten Welles with a lawsuit in order to get him to agree to giving him co-credit. (A Netflix movie – Mank – was made about this recently.)

* Although it was a critical success, Citizen Kane failed to recoup its costs at the box office. The film faded from view after its release, but returned to public attention when it was praised by French critics and re-released in 1956.

* Charles Foster Kane, the protagonist, was a composite character based mainly on media tycoon William Randolph Hearst. Hearst hated the movie and tried to shut it down. He was particularly angry about the movie’s depiction of a character based on his mistress, Marion Davies, a former showgirl whom he had tried to make into a Hollywood star.

* Rosebud was the trade name of the cheap little sled that Kane was playing with on the day he was taken away from his home and his mother. It is believed that it was also a reference to Hearst’s pet name for Davies: “tender button.”

* Hearst Castle, the main residence of an estate in San Simeon, California, that originally belonged to Hearst, was the inspiration for the “Xanadu” mansion in Citizen Kane. However, the estate was not used as a location for the film.

* Historically speaking, Xanadu, the first capital of the Mongol Empire, was established by Kublai Khan (1260-1294), the first emperor of China’s Yuan dynasty. Famous for its palaces, gardens, and waterways, it has come to stand for an idealized place of magnificence and beauty.

Critical Reception 

For 50 consecutive years, Citizen Kane stood at number one in the British Film Institute’s poll of critics. It was number one in the American Film Institute’s list of the 100 best American movies in 1998, as well as its 2007 update.

* “Citizen Kane is far and away the most surprising and cinematically exciting motion picture to be seen here in many a moon… it comes close to being the most sensational film ever made in Hollywood.” (Bosley Crowther, NYT)

* “Citizen Kane is a film possessing the sure dollar mark, which distinguishes every daring entertainment venture that is created by a workman who is a master of the technique and mechanics of his medium. It is a two-hour show, filled to the last minute with brilliant incident unreeled in method and effects that sparkle with originality and invention. Within the trade, Kane will stimulate keener creative efforts by Hollywood’s top directors.” (John C. Flinn, Sr., Variety)

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

TS recommended it to me a few weeks ago. I bought it and put it on top of my “recently recommended” pile.

I might have gotten to it a year from now, but the title intrigued me. So, I picked it up and started reading. It was an easy read. I finished it that evening.

Barking Up the Wrong Tree 

By Eric Barker

320 pages

Published May 16, 2017 by HarperOne

Barking Up the Wrong Tree follows the template of all bestselling self-improvement book by asking, “What are the traits of uncommonly successful people?” But it distinguishes itself from the pack by offering up lots of insights into success that run against the grain, by providing lots of evidence to support those insights, and by bringing them to life with lots of entertaining facts and stories.

What I Liked About Barking Up the Wrong Tree 

Many of Barker’s observations differ from conventional wisdom. (I don’t trust conventional wisdom.) Most of those jibe with observations I’ve made and written about over the last 22 years.

For example:

* There are two kinds of business leaders – corporate executives (who make predictable decisions) and entrepreneurs (who make unpredictable decisions).

* Networks are powerful. It’s as true at IBM as it is with small businesses.

* It’s not enough to do good work in a corporate environment. You have to get noticed. Which usually means you have to toot your own horn. Be modest. Give credit to others. But be sure key people know what you’ve done.

* Quantity produces quality. People that do great work tend to have been doing more work. This has always been my strategy. It is part of my Ready, Fire, Aim philosophy.

Critical Response 

* “Whether you are a connoisseur of self-help books, or despise them, you won’t be able to resist this recipe for living a better life.” (Robert Sutton)

* “Delightfully puckish, evidence-backed and full of insight, this book answers questions about success that have puzzled us for far too long.” (Adam Grant)

* “This book is compelling because Barker’s irreverence is so consistently on-target, relentlessly puncturing the wisdom balloons that most need bursting.” (Robert B. Cialdini)

Click here for a discussion about the book with Eric Barker.

And click here for a short video takeaway from the book.

Continue Reading

“Ideas in and of themselves have little value. It is their expression that matters – the particular emanation of the idea with its particular shape and size and bells and whistles.” – Michael Masterson

Continue Reading

A cipher (SY-fur) – from the Arabic for “zero” – is a secret code, usually one created using a mathematical algorithm. It can also be used to refer to someone or something of no importance.

Example: “An enormous amount of scientific language is metaphorical. We talk about a genetic code, where code originally meant a cipher; we talk about the solar system model of the atom as though the atom were like a sun and moon and planets.” (Steven Pinker)

Continue Reading

How to compete in a saturated market…

(Does this video make me look a little nutty?)

Continue Reading